Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2018
- Messages
- 3,634
@versub:
You obviously haven't read enough self-indulgent period novels :'p
You obviously haven't read enough self-indulgent period novels :'p
Because having a casual affair in the garden at your ball isn't actually that unusual (presuming others didn't believe it to be a random person who broke in) amongst the ranks of nobility in a certain period. If anything, protesting that it was a random assailant would make things worse; the assumption will be that he did something unspeakable to her, and in chauvinist-pig-land being a "ruined" woman is just about as damning as being a "wanton" one.Why would everyone suspect she's having an affair with a person who broke into her house at a party.
Carrying on the bloodline, of course. It doesn't seem like she has siblings, so she has to have some sort of respectable husband or the house will fall to ruin. Better to have rumours about how they had to purchase a husband for her, than to have her remain unmarried and become a spinstress; that would just confirm all the existing rumours.Why would her dad(?) marry her off to some fallen duke family? What are the circumstances that lead to it and what are the benefits?
That would be behavior most unbecoming of a woman in her position. (I mean, really, this part is the most historically accurate; if you think women get pressured too much to be subservient nowadays, you ain't seen nothing yet...)Why wouldn't she protest against the marriage?
* * *
... Having said all that I expect this story will ultimately deviate from the path it's on right now, and everyone will have anachronistic (that is to say, more-or-less-modern) attitudes and behaviours henceforth—but this all checks out just fine in the context of a loose historical novel.