Well, Griffith wanted to be King for the sake of it not because he cared about the people of the kingdom.The handsome leader of a mercenary group wants to make his own nation where there is no poverty and everyone is happy? not this shit again man!
ah, yes. the outer heavenThe handsome leader of a mercenary group wants to make his own nation where there is no poverty and everyone is happy? not this shit again man!
The handsome leader of a mercenary group wants to make his own nation where there is no poverty and everyone is happy? not this shit again man!
What I'm wondering is how the heck he gets these random specific ingredients, especially processed ingredients like tofu, when they're constantly on the move as mercenaries
Its good as long as he doesnt get a beheliti mean it makes sense he'd say something hopeful versus 'we'll live mediocre but peaceful lives' haha
while poverty is inevitable the negative effects of poverty are completely social. It wouldn't be that difficult to create a society where even the severely impoverished have food and shelter. The main thing that's stopping us from doing that in our world is that people don't want their tax money to be "wasted" on the poor.No poverty? Unlikely.
Less poverty? Possible.
The sad irony is that it's actually cheaper for the wallets of ordinary citizens to provide for the poorest than to just let them suffer and die. I remember reading an article many moons ago where someone crunched the numbers and found that it was cheaper for a city to just give houses to homeless people than to keep eating the costs for their care in emergency rooms alone. That's not even getting into how having a home is a nigh obligatory requirement to getting a job, and more employed people then paying taxes means improved services and lowered tax burdens for everyone. Add in things like increased costs for police and jails when homeless people will commit a minor crime when the weather gets really bad just to get a warm bed and food for a short time, and it becomes even clearer that society is better off taking care of its worst-off members, even if only in a financial sense, than refusing to do so on the basis of toddler-logic level ideas of fairness. My gut reaction to reading that article was that it was going to be total BS, but the maths were pretty clear, and it changed my mind on the topic.The main thing that's stopping us from doing that in our world is that people don't want their tax money to be "wasted" on the poor.