Yuusha ni Zenbu Ubawareta Ore wa Yuusha no Hahaoya to Party wo Kumimashita! - Vol. 1 Ch. 3

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 1, 2019
Messages
1,444
I still can't wrap my mind around how the age thing works in this series. Even if people died by the age of 50, being considered "old" by 17 is crazy. And yet, despite that I don't think I've seen a single child or otherwise "desirable"(by their standards) woman in the story yet outside the original party. Are young woman mythical here?
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
1,028
I still can't wrap my mind around how the age thing works in this series. Even if people died by the age of 50, being considered "old" by 17 is crazy. And yet, despite that I don't think I've seen a single child or otherwise "desirable"(by their standards) woman in the story yet outside the original party. Are young woman mythical here?
Where did it say they're considered old at age 17? I thought it was by the age of 25 or 30.

(For the following bit, keep in mind that I am not endorsing anything here. I mainly know about this because I had to do some research for a writing project.)

From what I know, the medical community seems to agree that the age of 16 is the earliest for girls to start safely delivering babies - with exception for girls who are on very early or very late developmental curves. Granted, they also say that its best to wait until they're in their early twenties due to their brains still being in development. But that hardly matters in a setting where people tend to keel over by the time they're 55. What matters in that case is that you start pumping out babies as soon as possible.

So, if this society's expectation is that people should be having babies by the age of 17, then that I could believe. But old? Not even with life spans that short.
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: GK
Aggregator gang
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
47
Surprisingly, the size of that bouquet is also the same size of my dick everytime I meet this MILF, I mean love for Shizuko-san. People of these world are fucking blind for calling them grandma. If she's a fucking grandma with that looks, that makes Western MILFs mummies.
Dmc9GqF.jpg
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 20, 2023
Messages
4,309
I still can't wrap my mind around how the age thing works in this series. Even if people died by the age of 50, being considered "old" by 17 is crazy. And yet, despite that I don't think I've seen a single child or otherwise "desirable"(by their standards) woman in the story yet outside the original party. Are young woman mythical here?
Simple.
pjpyq9L.jpg
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Nov 25, 2020
Messages
130
Where did it say they're considered old at age 17? I thought it was by the age of 25 or 30.

(For the following bit, keep in mind that I am not endorsing anything here. I mainly know about this because I had to do some research for a writing project.)

From what I know, the medical community seems to agree that the age of 16 is the earliest for girls to start safely delivering babies - with exception for girls who are on very early or very late developmental curves. Granted, they also say that its best to wait until they're in their early twenties due to their brains still being in development. But that hardly matters in a setting where people tend to keel over by the time they're 55. What matters in that case is that you start pumping out babies as soon as possible.

So, if this society's expectation is that people should be having babies by the age of 17, then that I could believe. But old? Not even with life spans that short.
If I recall from the web novel. 20 is considered old and undesireable.

I'm just following this to see if it diverts from the novel and actually provides something of value, which I doubt because it would need to heavily divert from the source, or if all the excited coomers are going to be sorely disappointed if the manga follows the novel closely, because let's just say the source material doesn't seem to actually care too much about having a good time with the MILFs.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 1, 2018
Messages
424
Where did it say they're considered old at age 17? I thought it was by the age of 25 or 30.

(For the following bit, keep in mind that I am not endorsing anything here. I mainly know about this because I had to do some research for a writing project.)

From what I know, the medical community seems to agree that the age of 16 is the earliest for girls to start safely delivering babies - with exception for girls who are on very early or very late developmental curves. Granted, they also say that its best to wait until they're in their early twenties due to their brains still being in development. But that hardly matters in a setting where people tend to keel over by the time they're 55. What matters in that case is that you start pumping out babies as soon as possible.

So, if this society's expectation is that people should be having babies by the age of 17, then that I could believe. But old? Not even with life spans that short.
There's a lot of cultural factors that can play a part as well. There are some periods in both the ancient and medieval world when the average age of marriage for women might have been fairly low, as low as 20. These periods are bookended by periods of history where the average would be more like 25, not too far off from most modern figures. There's no indication that for these periods, fertility or health was a factor, so the influence may have been cultural, though likely in terms of influx of under-16yo marriages.

That being said, even taking that into account, I don't think there is any known culture where women over the age of 20 are considered completely expired goods. It would simply be a hugely unrealistic waste, and it's unlikely that any arbitrary cultural trend of preference for younger women would be able to overturn that entirely. At worst, a woman past 25 years or so might be considered a "B-pick", pretty much the same as today with impressions of women over 30. And we may joke about them being old, but generally people would have been considered old only when they were incapable of working. Even in the ancient world, that would at least have been at worst around 50, but usually 60~70 same as today. This would be independent of the average life expectancy...a culture could consider someone old at 60 but have an average life expectancy of 55 for various reasons.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top