@Zephyrus No. That's a false accusation. Out of all the rules in 5.1 you're probably aiming for 5.1.5. Lets see what that was about,
"Direct Personal Attacks: We encourage intelligent, thoughtful discussion on MangaDex. We encourage users to criticize the content of a post and not the poster themselves. This particular violation will be taken on a case by case basis since context and severity of the violation is important when a mod is considering taking action. For example,
calling someone an idiot and offering evidence why they're an idiot will most likely not result in moderator action. Calling someone an idiot and doing nothing else will result in moderator action, not because you called someone an idiot, but because it was the sole content of your post. Note that especially egregious foul language may or may not result in moderator action."
You see the one I bolded? I offered reasons for why I said what I said so I didn't violate anything. To the point I made in a different angle, A clown is only able to do what they do because it has an audience. Without an audience he have no show to put on. It's the same case for these manga. Those readers are the reason why we get these subpar writings for they enable these titles. I'm perfectly justified in calling them whatever I called them and I gave explanations for why I said it.
I committed 5.3.1 with this response but your accusation is unfounded against me. You can ban me from this site for raising this against you but I'd want you to rethink your warning against me for the sake of fairness.