Active member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 94
Take the shitflinging somewhere else
Then you're just objectively wrong, if you consume any media at all i shouldnt have to explain how much impact something like yu yu hakusho had on the manga that came after it. in fact you're just being intentionaly obtuse because there is no argument against it.Of course i deny this since you provide no data or informations, just fabrications based on lies and speculations.
deflection: 1
This is similarly objectively wrong, and a fundamental missunderstanding of freedom of speech, in fact in the USA the laws against depictions of cp extend to drawings and animation (https://www.robertmhelfend.com/criminal-defense/sex-crimes/lolicon-illegal/) so that makes your first point invalid capitalising "LAW" doesnt make you any less wrongI do not care what laws have Japan, real life issues are regulated by LAW and have nothing to do with fictions or drawings, drawing can be morally wrong too since nobody is harmed in real life. Real life LAW protect people not their own moral, this is why we have freedom of speech.
similarly freedom of speech and expression does not mean there are no legal consequences for anything you say, type and create because then criminal confessions would be rendered null, there are limitations, such as the law i linked above
on top of that "i dont care what laws there are in japan" is a fantastic way to ignore the point entirely, well done ⭐
This is completely divorced from my point, it wasnt about what he drew it was about his reputation in the industry but you cant argue against that either because its true. on top of that no artists dont have the right to draw whatever they want as shown by the law i mentioned above and also depictions of certain things and peopleWatsuki is the perfect example that what an author draw is completely unrelated to what he do in the real world. Every author is different, every author have the right to draw whatever they want since nobody is harmed and everybody have the rights to ignore such works.
delfection: 2
ive already given examples of how saying that past works by previous authors dont have any influence on works after it is just completely incorrect. also is your point now that "people still break the law" ok and? it just means that its still continuing and people are being influeced by things they have read before.There is no influence at all, moreover ero loli manga stil exist, even if the censorship is more strong, but neither was an issue in the past and neither is now. The excuse from the detractors is again the fact that people can emulate it, and is about 30 years that i read this crap and since then nothing happened, but this is the only excuse that moralfags can use because they have nothing left, they have no proof, they have no evidence, they have no data, so they continue this farce.
anyway was that next point just that you have been reading what the USA's federal bureau of investigation legally classifies as child pornography and that you are alright? yeah ok dude. also you want further proof that people are influence by what they read before? look at goku who's design was based off sun wukong (Toriyama directly states this if you want to argue that) who then inspired countless, litteraly countless other shounen protags. but you deny that journey to the west had any influence on Toriyama after he read it? you want data there are countless examples. search up any genre and you'll see its all because people read one thing and liked it enough to copy parts of it
also cool it with the homophobia, we get if, you came from the /a/ boards
everything ive said is true, in fact if you want a direct and easy example of a mangaka inspired by the creations of a pedo look at this, oda based zoro of kenshin it was right there (and i know you're gonna go on a tangent about how kenshin had none of the blah blah blah, thats not the point of this example and you know it) just proof that what i said before was factual.More and more fantastic theories and fabrications, this is just your personal opinion and grudge against otaku culture and certain works. Nothing you said is true.
also yeah i have a grudge agains mf's like you so adamant to (in your own admission )
read child porn (as legaly defined on the federal level in the united states) that you make the space weird for every one else, its the same grude i have against the weirdos who dont shower before they go to a con, the same grudge i have against the people who stalk cosplayers etc. just be normal30 years that i read this crap
oh we just onto baseless ad homenim attacks now? ok but just remember you admitted here in writing you watch cp soYou are a racist and a liar, you just do not like this manga because the author do not write the story how you want and now you blame and insult not only people who like it, defend it or do not give a shit about such trivial matters as ages of fake characters, but also japanese people and their own culture, their law, and what they do in their country. Pathetic.
im not the one ranting in a thread about his right to read cp man, i mean you can continue to cry while we call you weird tho. imagine trying to take the high ground on the argument of "i want the characters having sex in my media to be of legal age" but on the side against, its crazy. go back to 4chan and mald or smthAlso stop quoting me with this shit, you convince no one and accomplish nothing, i will never agree with your comical and absurd way of thinking based on ignorance and racism, and the more you spread hate against other culture the more you are delusional and pathetic.