Do Chokkyuu Kareshi x Kanojo - Vol. 5 Ch. 29 - This is Our Promotion

[Ddog123]

@Inpasttense I don't think people are complaining because they haven't been in relationships. Obviously issues like sexual incompatibility are things to worry about in a relationship and I feel like anybody can understand that. I think people are mostly complaining because 1. The drama felt fairly forced. 2. This doesn't seem like the kind of manga that should have drama like this.

I feel like peoples criticism's regarding this are fairly valid

 

[tonymuffin]

This whole drama seems stupid as hell , glad that it's over

 

[dsquare682]

I WONDER IF THE REASON HE WAS WORKING AT THE RAMEN SHOP WAS TO BUY THAT NECKLACE

All caps cause this manga is loud

 

[yamaka__]

how does 3-4 chapters of drama almost ruin a series

 

[highsofly1]

LOL To think this whole drama started because Mako, in her POV, saw Shinichi fighting Suzuki over a porno XDDDDDDDDDD

 

[Darkhaliz]

tears of joy :')

 

[IAmSecretlyAWeeb]

Welp, I'm glad that's over.

 

[Tonikill1]

A true man. No hesitation

 

[rxfan]

Glad it’s done, don’t know why author introduced such strife into the relationship, damn that pervy monk

 

[BallerSwagBro9K]

10/10 Super Wholesome

 

[asspussy]

damn you Suzuki

 

[aangry_aardvark]

that's the biggest tub of popcorn I've ever seen.

 

[Bruhihatethiswebsite]

Fuck this chapter got me in tears.

 

[Monn12]

Idiotic ARC. Does it give readers valuable message? Yes. Was it correct to place it with them? NO!
SIDE FUCKING CHARACTERS. SPECIFICALLY AUTHOR COULD GIVE 2 CHAPTERS FOR THAT MONK FINALLY FINDING A GIRLFRIEND BUT BECAUSE HE IS ONLY THINKING ABOUT SEX AND SEXUAL STUFF HE IS IN THE SLUMP WITH HER. AND MAIN COUPLE HELPS THEM TO GET BACK TOGETHER BY UNDERSTANDING EACH OTHER.

This drama was uncharacteristic of the main couple, some of the people who are defending this arc have 0 thinking outside of the box. Side characters can be used perfectly to create drama and situations that are not natural for other characters. Author forgot and used unwisely story and characters.

 

[SpecialProjectY]

There's a lot teenagers who never had or most of ever will be in any relationship a part thankfully their own hand, because the point was mentioned several times and it flew above their empty heads.

The point is Shinichi knows jack shit about sex, it's 100% performance for him like some sort of competition, while it's more of mutual understanding.
There's rarely anyone who could came from just slamming like a wild animal, this isn't chap porn movie or doujinshi where out of the blue everyone orgasm mutually after few rough ripp and tear.

The issue was partially about the porn mag Mako collected, because it clearly depicted some low tier "hurr durr I'll use u as a sex toy woman, watch me cum" cheap porn story for incels, no wonder Mako got pissed.

If you have problems following this really basic story, I pray to gods of underworld you never see any significant other, because not only you will waste their time, but also you're a complete oblivious ass lol

 

[Monn12]

There's a lot teenagers

You didn't quite understand what i meant? What i wrote in caps was basically a good plot point that could have been used, which actually sounds more reasonable.
For example MMC wasn't a porn addict unlike his friend who actually was and actually could encounter this problem.
Just an anecdote but i somewhat started having sex just about the time i learned about porn and my sexual experience wasn't near the porn levels of stupidity since i wasn't introduced to it much (sneak peaks on late night tv channels). On the other hand i had a few people i knew, who actually tried to be like "porn" stars and had porn addictions (i presume). They tried porn moves and even had problems with stimulation (porn damages people). Out of all the people i knew, majority who had problems were casual pornographic material users, they were mistaking pistoning actions for sex.

Instead author decided to put quite normal (yet quite energetic people) on the spotlight with sex problems. Even more this was made as a cheap and stupid dramatic plot point which was completely out of their usual character and when that arc was finished they returned to normal.
Like i said using side character like his porn addicted friend could serve as a better material due to him having an actual history with porn. Most guys in my opinion pre-sex learn and read something or ask for advice, before engaging (at their ages at least, i would understand 13-14 something being stupid and acting on the spur of the moment). Also as a good plot point, author could warn quite openly people who indulge in porn about all of the dangers it poses. Instead author used cheap theatrics and cheap learning experience.

 

[SpecialProjectY]

You didn't quite understand what i meant? What i wrote in caps was basically a good plot point that could have been used, which actually sounds more reasonable.
For example MMC wasn't a porn addict unlike his friend who actually was and actually could encounter this problem.
Just an anecdote but i somewhat started having sex just about the time i learned about porn and my sexual experience wasn't near the porn levels of stupidity since i wasn't introduced to it much (sneak peaks on late night tv channels). On the other hand i had a few people i knew, who actually tried to be like "porn" stars and had porn addictions (i presume). They tried porn moves and even had problems with stimulation (porn damages people). Out of all the people i knew, majority who had problems were casual pornographic material users, they were mistaking pistoning actions for sex.

Instead author decided to put quite normal (yet quite energetic people) on the spotlight with sex problems. Even more this was made as a cheap and stupid dramatic plot point which was completely out of their usual character and when that arc was finished they returned to normal.
Like i said using side character like his porn addicted friend could serve as a better material due to him having an actual history with porn. Most guys in my opinion pre-sex learn and read something or ask for advice, before engaging (at their ages at least, i would understand 13-14 something being stupid and acting on the spur of the moment). Also as a good plot point, author could warn quite openly people who indulge in porn about all of the dangers it poses. Instead author used cheap theatrics and cheap learning experience.

Okay, thanks for elaborating.

Too have witnessed first hand of "bad sexual education", knew girls that believed their orgasming was bad and denied to progress further because they believed it was pee, figuring there's something terribly wrong with them...

Then there weas a few who who were surprised men can not nut in just under 5min to 10min tops, still going hard, plenty of men suffer from Premature Ejaculation or even Rapid Ejaculation, ~30%-40% in fact.

Also imitating porn actors extremely vocal orgasming, one watched mainly JAV and it sound like dolphin screeching... was... like... what in actual fuck?!?

Agree with you partially then, but the arc WAS good and very unique in school rom-com until it was too quickly resolved basically in under few pages like nothing happened...

 

[Monn12]

Agree with you partially then, but the arc WAS good and very unique in school rom-com until it was too quickly resolved basically in under few pages like nothing happened...

That's the whole point. If author decided and thought through pre-arc setting, arc setting and after-arc setting i wouldn't complain.
But that arc was just like a PASTE IN for browny points. It was out of character and out of place, i didn't expect straight people like them to encounter a problem like that, like at all.

For pre-arc setting his friend would have been ideal (ground was ready), arc setting is the issue at hand about him having unreal expectations towards women due to his porn addiction and main couple helping him and a girl traverse the path. After-arc would be seeing him learning about the pitfalls and understanding that porn isn't representative of intimate life.

Spoiler: Off-topic about media industry destroying our perception and reality

Actually same applies to movies even, sadly i consider movies(tv-series) and all media net negative IF it represents performative or otherwise unreal life. As an example many women tend to think that romance (that they see in movies and books) is the main factor in choosing lovers and are expectant of having the same experience (sparkles(butterflies), romantic gestures and other fluffy movie stuff). Men on the other hand expect woman's love and affection if they are big, rich and etc. (What i want to say that both genders have a skewed view of romance)
Though i do not blame media content (it's just a tool) i blame people imprinting fantasy that they see and applying it to reality. There are borders of course people watching/playing massacre scenarios likely won't do it but other subtle stuff is being ingrained in our memory.