Lol no it's not the main, it's just one of the 4 points.
Here is what I said:
It's not cute for someone to be so persistent that they'd keep going after you, not only after you've said no, but also knowing you have someone else. Why not just be a home-wrecker and bang a married man at that point?
I can assume you're smart enough to recognise that these two parts:
It's not cute for someone to be so persistent that they'd keep going after you
Why not just be a home-wrecker and bang a married man at that point?
Are not actually points to our argument. So that leaves this part:
not only after you've said no, but also knowing you have someone else.
So that's only really two points in a single sentence there buddy, if we're counting them separately, but I'm saying 'he said no,
AND she believes he is in a relationship" - so really just one point.
Or in other words
knowing you have someone else.
Was the most important part of the point I was making, and that was the part you were removing, thus me saying you were removing the crux of my argument. Why did you think I made the home wrecker comparison?
Also it doesn't matter if he IS actually in a relationship right now; it's that she
believes he is.
Just say that your argument was very weak and move on
?
Well alright, I didn't think your argument was that bad but I guess you're just lacking confidence. Chin up my guy!
Anyway, move on little buddy.