If you interpreted my second post as detailing exactly what my first post was sarcastically saying (demonstrably false reality), through further sarcasm (faux mock shock at demonstrably false reality being false), then you interpreted it rightForgive me if I am misinterpreting your post, that is entirely possible as tone doesn't always translate in text... (even with emojis).
(both posts being such to express my annoyance at the authors development - a double-whammy I like to use to vent annoyance. That - like a knock-knock joke - requires someone asking what I mean with the first post. I suspect it's people reading the mood and kindly giving me the follow-up I was requesting (which is appreciated), but I'm happy even if they actually were confused (either way I happily got my equivalent of "who's there?"))
Yes. Neither of those three things happened in that scene. Stating obviously untrue things like that is a form of communication that can be used in many ways.It doesn't look like regret in those panels, it doesn't look like he is diagnosing his brother, and it certainly doesn't look like he is curing his brother (which, I am reasonably sure requires him to speak verbally to do).
In this case, it showed my annoyance with authors using such 'foreshadowing' by taking the slightly humorous grammatical error of said 'foreshadowing' (that was obvious in what it meant and could have been easily internally corrected just by seeing what actually happens in that scene) and pretending it was correct - in the process explicitly rejecting reality and imposing my own, an imaginary one (that is with even the most cursory glance demonstrably false. thee times over) where it wasn't foreshadowing and thus I had nothing to be annoyed by.
Yes. That is what actually happened in that scene. And the fact that it was forced like that (right, so you see your brother all black and blue and don't care to make certain there's no complications from that, or otherwise help it heal? Even if you believed them, the following actions made no sense) only made my annoyance with the authors development greater.What it does look like is him accepting that his brother and brother's friend are telling the truth (at the moment) and him leaving without questioning further.
Last edited: