This will show the actual story we haven't been told, that's a new story, unless you know exactly the circunstancies it happened. Flashbacks are useful story telling if done correctly, hating all of them just don't make sense, like it's not an actual story lolFuck me, flashbacks are the absolute worst. I guess I'll just wait until this crap is over and the actual story is being told. I'd literally rather a manga go on hiatus while new story is being written than have a flashback arc
Deadass I don't understand the reason to be upset myself.This will show the actual story we haven't been told, that's a new story, unless you know exactly the circunstancies it happened. Flashbacks are useful story telling if done correctly, hating all of them just don't make sense, like it's not an actual story lol
I mean, it's both. Well technically not a prequel as that is a form of sequel aka a new work.I thought this was a new arc but apparently a prequel?
I have fond memories of all three of those, so if done right, this should be good stuff.Kinda like Bleach Pendulum, JJK vol 0, and Naruto Kakashi Gaiden huh.
It's not actual story. It can't change or add to the actual conflict happening. It's just useless world building.This will show the actual story we haven't been told, that's a new story, unless you know exactly the circunstancies it happened. Flashbacks are useful story telling if done correctly, hating all of them just don't make sense, like it's not an actual story lol
I'm not sure I ever saw anyone be this wrong.It's not actual story. It can't change or add to the actual conflict happening. It's just useless world building.
You think talking about totally concluded events magically changes the present, so I don't take your criticism very seriously.I'm not sure I ever saw anyone be this wrong.
I'm not who you talked to before (reading is hard, huh?), so you have no idea what I think. That aside, it seems that you don't understand how explaining past events can shed a completely new light on later plot, and that's kinda sad.You think talking about totally concluded events magically changes the present, so I don't take your criticism very seriously.
Champ, you're the one who said the point I made was wrong, which is why I replied to you. And the point I made is that flashbacks can't change current events, and is pointless worldbuilding, so that means you have to think that would be wrong. Which means you'd have to thibk retelling of past events can change the current story, which isn't how temporality works. Which your not understanding explains how I could respond directly to a post you made in reply to me, but you think I'm talking to someone else about something different.I'm not who you talked to before (reading is hard, huh?), so you have no idea what I think. That aside, it seems that you don't understand how explaining past events can shed a completely new light on later plot, and that's kinda sad.