But because Kayo and MC never went past kissing each other...
That's all I really needed to hear. The fact that Kayo accepted MC's kiss is a sign that there are feelings. I can make the argument about whether it was sincere and not lust-driven or out of obligation and who initiated it, but I won't. I overlooked this detail so I was mistaken in my previous argument, my bad.
But I hope you see the difference between her "accepting MC's kiss" vs "refusing Iketani" as proof and understand why it was necessary to go through the argument that the latter holds no weight as a proof of love. With this tiny detail, I am on board with the fact that Kayo started developing her own feelings during their relationship.
And FYI, "I need you" is a very well known way of saying "I love you". Even more so when that person is saying "I truly need you."
If those two are the same for Kayo, why make that distinction in this current chapter when saying "I like you, but unsure whether it is love"? What is causing her doubt? This remains consistent in both manga and novel that's why I wanted to confirm.
It is a well known fact that Japanese people are reluctant to openly express their feelings to each other. This is even more so when it comes to expressing romantic affection towards each other. Why do you think the trope of making a big deal "holding hands" and "calling each other by their given names" is so prevalent in Japanese stories?
But Kayo is not known to hold back on the intimacy aspect. You know how far she went with Iketani already. You said it, she's the more experienced one here. Again, this argument falls under "fitting a description to support a claim". I would understand if Kayo reasoning was to keep MC pure or something like that.
And the one that is not openly expressing their love is the MC. That is the entire reason why Kayo got bored and frustrated with him to the point she cheated on him with Iketani. The MC said it himself that they never got past kissing and Kayo's main complaint about the MC was that he is indecisive. Kayo may be a shelfish character, but you can not blame her for being bored and frustrated with MC not doing anything past kissing. Especially after Kayo went all the way with Iketani. The thing Kayo did wrong was not breaking up with MC before seeing Iketani.
Double standards. Kayo didn't express it too so why only blame MC? Using your past argument, Kayo was the more experienced one in dating and sex so shouldn't she be the more proactive one especially if she's the one strongly wishing for physical intimacy? Mind you, it is MC who confessed and expressed his affection first. I don't want an argument saying "Well, in Japanese culture women tend to be more conservative so Kayo..." because it's a convenient one.
I did not refute anything. It was just too much of a pain to type "Kayo fell out of romantic love for MC, which transformed into familial love with some possessiveness when she cheated" over and over again that I just shortened it. Completely forgetting how important it was because I assumed you knew what I was talking about since I have been repeating this for 3 days.
Alright let's clear this up then.
My stance is "Kayo wanting MC to father the baby is driven by fear not love. It is not familial love in any sense."
Your stance is "Kayo wanting MC to father the baby is familial love".
Our point of disagreement is the "familial love".
Do you have a possession that you treasure immensely? That is possesive love. Do you love your parents? If yes, does this mean you want to kiss and have sex with them? I hope not. See, there are multiple different kinds of love. Just because Kayo does not want to have sex with MC does not mean she does not have any loving feelings for MC.
Sure there are different kinds. But you really need to take the MC's perspective. How does MC view it? How does her acts of betrayal appear to him? What about pushing the responsibility of carrying a stranger's baby onto him? Sure, sure, Kayo sees them all as love. But what about the MC, the recipient? Is it received as love? An abuser may call "violence" as a form of "love". But to the victim, is it the same?
Depending on which stance you take, it will be different. That's why, if you are keen on believing that Kayo's treatment of MC as a property is familial love. Feel free. But you won't convince me to think the same, because to me and the MC, it's not.
Kayo is a shelfish girl. All of her actions so far have been selfish ones. But just because Kayo is selfish does not mean that she did not love MC. Again, why bother breaking up with Iketani when he asked Kayo to leave MC for him? Why bother getting into a relationship with MC in the first place? Why bother refusing Iketani's many advances to stay loyal to MC in the beginning? And I am basing Kayo's "familial love" on the fact Kayo and MC are close childhood friends. You really think close childhood friends that spent all their lives together would not develop something like familial love towards one another?
Same arguments. Let me answer each question.
1. Again, why bother breaking up with Iketani when he asked Kayo to leave MC for him?
They lived far away. Their relationship weren't bound to last when they only met from time to time on training camps.
2. Why bother getting into a relationship with MC in the first place?
Ask Kayo, because even herself was unsure. Maybe she enjoys dating? Maybe she's missing that physical relationship she used to have? Maybe she's comforted by MC's kindness? Maybe because there's no other person to direct her attention to when Iketani was gone? Many possible answers. This question remains unanswered because Kayo does not explicit state her reasons.
3. Why bother refusing Iketani's many advances to stay loyal to MC in the beginning?
Many possible answers. Maybe out of obligation? Maybe her interest towards Iketani has already dropped at that point and just gradually went back up in time? Maybe she genuinely wants to focus on MC? Same as above, this question remains unanswered.
4. You really think close childhood friends that spent all their lives together would not develop something like familial love towards one another?
No I'm not refuting that. However, it's not impossible for that "familial love" to turn into a possessive obsession, especially when one becomes complacent. That's why the term "convenient person" exists. You seem to think that once that "familial love" forms, it will never change to something else.
I made my statement in reference to you dismissing and misinterpreting what I have been claiming all along about what kind of love Kayo feels. I made it very clear several times that I believe Kayo currently feels two different kinds of loving feelings towards MC: familial and love of one's possession.
Then what did I misinterpret and dismiss in your statement because of the novel? Allow me to clarify it so please spell it out. I am firm on the point about that the love portrayed in this manga is not "familial love", whether we consider the novel or not.
I made it very clear several times that I believe Kayo currently feels two different kinds of loving feelings towards MC: familial and love of one's possession.
Sure, but I disagree on the "familial love". That's why we're having this argument.
You deliberately made a statement that twisted what I have been saying all along to mean Kayo's possesiveness towards MC is familial love. That is what I called you out on.
Aha. I think I know where your confusion comes from. You misinterpreted it as me, twisting your words and say your notion of familial love is the same as possessiveness. No, not at all. I am clearly aware of the difference of the two. I am saying that you are mistaken into thinking that Kayo is acting out of familial love. It is not. She is acting out of possessiveness and selfishness. It will never be familial love.
Do you think saying "I want you to father someone else's baby" is familial love just because of the word "father"?
Are you really turning blind to the fact that Kayo is forcing someone to take responsibility of raising else's baby?
Do you think raising someone else's baby is such a simple matter that can be dismissed by saying "I'm asking you because I want you to become my family"?
Do you really consider that as familial love?
Isn't that pure selfishness?
You keep focusing on Kayo, but you never looked at it from MC's perspective.
You are thinking that Kayo not pursuing MC is happening in a vacuum. That everything Kayo does is not related to everything she did before and since. It is Kayo being close childhood friends with MC+Kayo realizing how much she "truly needed" MC+Kayo leaving Iketani after he asks Kayo to leave MC for him+Kayo not dating anyone until MC asked her out+Kayo and MC kissing during dating+Kayo repeatedly refusing Iketani's advances for at least 3 months+Kayo feeling guilty for cheating. It is all these things together that show that Kayo did romantically love MC.
Same arguments. Those are very weak points when you consider how far she can go with Iketani.
Kayo being close friends with MC is simply just friendship.
Uttering words "truly needed" without backing them by actions will just remain as words.
Kayo not dating anyone until MC asked her out (as if she's obliged to date someone) as reason of being in love is another assumption you made.
Everyone feels guilty about cheating, not just Kayo (if you are a sane person at least).
Refusing advances for at least 3 months does not amount to anything when you eventually succumb to it and even go as far as think that your partner will just forgive you.
However, Kayo and MC kissing during dating IS one convincing proof. But honestly, I feel it's just hard to prove things on your end because the manga never really gave a closer view on their relationship, especially during the times they dated. So I think no matter how much we argue on this specific matter, we won't reach an agreement. For this point, I think we can just stand by our own separate stances. These are likely the areas the author intentionally left for interpretation.
Even other people that have read the web novel have pointed out the manga omitts and changes things, so I am not the only one making this claim.
Sorry, but it's not a really valid argument to use "someone said it" as source, especially when we are having a very meaningful discussion. I know we both don't have that much luxury of time to check things out, so it's probably better to simply avoid making such claims. This is not to degrade you or anything, I just wish for a proper discussion.
I claim they are different and gave a couple of examples why.
There are no examples you can give if you haven't read it yourself so better quote where those claims came or don't make them at all.
And I never argued the web novel covered events after the manga ends, so I don't know why you are bringing that up.
The intention was to correct that statement on your behalf because I read the novel. Pardon me if it was unsolicited but I don't want other readers in this forum to be mislead.