really? You're just now noticing?Mangaka is a fucking moron
really? You're just now noticing?Mangaka is a fucking moron
The story is all over the place damn like chill, god damn too much going on when it's stil like what under 10 chapter? The other barrier master manga does it a tad bit better and I'm not comparing here, it's just observation.
Just a tad bit better
Or she might be related to one of the hundred-or-so people they've just massacredmy bet is she just looks like that or she just needs really strong glasses
Nope, what happened makes perfect sense for an entitled noble who can not see beyound their own biases. He is a minor local power player not someone up on national level affairs, so thought he could control his new "lord" without even asking WHY they gave him the citry based on the MCs origins alone.Mangaka is a fucking moron
Pride, and probably thinks he has some legal protection or custom to protect him.What DOESN'T make sense here is this guy literally just watched all his men get completely eviscerated in front of him and yet he was still acting all high & mighty despite that. Something was severely wrong in his head.
Those were shadows not masks, to show their negative intent.Just curious what's with the face masks and why did that noble try to kill the guy who was just appointed by the government highest authority?
He should have at least expected them to check up on the guy they placed there to see how is he fairing.
Not going the way I like does not mean it is bad or dumb. not thate I am surprised considerg the sheer number of manga "fans" who have no understanding of Japanese culture and call stuff idiotic for the MC following traditional japanese values or not being an egotisticval/entitled/violet idiot like US culture tells THEM to be.really? You're just now noticing?
Why does this chapter repeatedly and exclusively use "they" for Azazel? He was introduced in the last chapter, is clearly male, and was consistently referred to as such in the previous chapter: "This guy", "he" multiple times by multiple characters, "my right hand man", "his presence". This, along with the inconsistent names and time spans (already mentioned by someone else above), makes it seem like the previous translator was replaced wholesale.
I know we're all just feeding our isekai-slop addiction, it's not high art, and translations are free, but a little more consistency/quality control/common sense would improve the reading experience a lot.
who is SHE talking about besides azazel to use "they"?
What is this they/them bullshit, he is clearly a dude. Also use the word "it" For those with gender unknown
I think they tried to use noble/archaic speech like Thou or Thee but missed completely. Probably. Or not.The English word "they" was redefined to be a correct singular gender-neutral pronoun, ever since 2014. Although I find issue with the consistency of referring to this new demon's gender, it's a minor nitpick. Besides, it's physically impossible for a male to wear such a long V-neck.
Prior to redefining "they", one would often have to refer to ambiguously gendered ones as one.
i only think she isnt because they said demons can “detect killing intent” and if she had some she probably would have died instantly right?Or she might be related to one of the hundred-or-so people they've just massacred
...redefined by whom exactly?The English word "they" was redefined to be a correct singular gender-neutral pronoun, ever since 2014. Although I find issue with the consistency of referring to this new demon's gender, it's a minor nitpick. Besides, it's physically impossible for a male to wear such a long V-neck.
Prior to redefining "they", one would often have to refer to ambiguously gendered ones as one.
Absolutely do not do that. "It" is only used as a gender-neutral pronoun for animals, babies, and objects.Also use the word "it" For those with gender unknown
"They" has been used as a singular gender-neutral pronoun for centuries. Though obviously it has become more widely accepted in the past decade or two.The English word "they" was redefined to be a correct singular gender-neutral pronoun, ever since 2014. Although I find issue with the consistency of referring to this new demon's gender, it's a minor nitpick. Besides, it's physically impossible for a male to wear such a long V-neck.
Prior to redefining "they", one would often have to refer to ambiguously gendered ones as one.
In my apparent misremembering, I recall a headline for some dictionary adding a definition for singular "they". I can't find such an article from the time frame I remember (2014) on Google. My claim that singular 'they' was officially recognized by some authority in 2014 is likely incorrect....redefined by whom exactly?
Didn't know languages had official regulators. Cool. I had assumed linguistic rules were determined by whatever colloquial usage becomes popular enough.English is one of the few weirdo languages with no official regulators that could either push for a redefinition, or even acquiesce to a shift in meaning having happened organically and making it official, as the more lax regulators usually do.
Think Denethor, the Steward of Gondor.The MC's death will spell the downfall of humanity? That's okay, just use a barrier to repel death.
These guys were the housekeepers / lord of this mansion, they were not exactly on board with the king's plan to have this random guy swoop in and take over their entire operation. Makes sense well enough.
What DOESN'T make sense here is this guy literally just watched all his men get completely eviscerated in front of him and yet he was still acting all high & mighty despite that. Something was severely wrong in his head.
While technically not incorrect, the genderless term "it" has negative connotations in English (US, at least) and should usually be avoided.What is this they/them bullshit, he is clearly a dude. Also use the word "it" For those with gender unknown
The French do, since the 17th century. They're fanatical about keeping the language "pure".In my apparent misremembering, I recall a headline for some dictionary adding a definition for singular "they". I can't find such an article from the time frame I remember (2014) on Google. My claim that singular 'they' was officially recognized by some authority in 2014 is likely incorrect.
Didn't know languages had official regulators. Cool. I had assumed linguistic rules were determined by whatever colloquial usage becomes popular enough.