Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2023
- Messages
- 3,084
I am a big enough person to recognize the gaps in my memory (it has been years since I've read through the earlier arcs) so thank you for filling them in. I will nonetheless take issue with the accompanying, unwarranted personal attacks and consequently deliver a bonk in reply.You really need to reread the whole manga. You either have a very bad memory or have terrible reading comprehension.
Mao got a hunch that Jinshi is way more important than just an eunuch very early on (that time she pushed him out of danger and hurt her leg) but she decided to ignore it to avoid trouble. This wasn’t implied but showed clearly. Later on she deduced the relationship between Jinshi and consort Adou. But again, she just shook it off and avoid pursuing it. That’s the two I can remember but I’m sure there are more. Whenever it comes to Jinshi’s background, Mao actively avoids getting deeper because she knows it’s too dangerous. The fact that she discovered that he’s not an eunuch at all and again avoid accepting it is entirely consistent with her behaviour right from the beginning. She didn’t just figure it out 60 chapters in. She figured it out bits by bits throughout the manga from the beginning until now.
You just managed to miss out all the Everest-sized breadcrumps.
spoiler to indulge in little more pettiness:
ah heck, let's make it two since I'm a little peeved about having a rational literary decomposition argument being judged as equivalent to advocating rape, but I'll stop there. Bonk.
I'd also like to ask if breadcrumps (krumps?) are delicious because I am apparently bad at reading comprehension and unable to infer intent from the letters presented in front of me.
Back to the matter at hand (ha!) I argue that recognizing there is something different about Jinshi is not the same as deducing that he is not a eunuch. Maomao derisively calling him "eunuch" consistently up through this arc indicates that she never seriously considered the possibility that he wasn't (even if he was special), and that's where I find the discrepancy in her deductive skills to arise.
Or perhaps this is an intentional discrepancy, since her fondness for nicknames (e.g., "that quack") could indicate a penchant for pigeonholing once she has a feel for a person, which could be an interesting foible to explore as she attempts to dig into the conspiracy. I'd be quite happy if that turns out to be the case. It would add layers to her character knowing that her skills are ultimately susceptible to the sin of being human.