Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2024
- Messages
- 1,512
Sorry, but the big oppai glasses onee-san sort of takes away from the serious vibe
Sorry, but the big oppai glasses onee-san sort of takes away from the serious vibe
My parents got 8 year age gapa 10-year age cap???
im sorry but that'll NEVER work.unless in a manga...
Exactly this doesn't feel good, even from the beginning i was like WTFThe age gap isn't the issue. The issue is that he knew her when she was in elementary school. There's a difference in meeting someone in their twenties and you being in your thirties than knowing them when they weren't even a teen and you were an adult. There's no way I could do that. That's definitely off-putting.
I thought you were joking, but seriously, 10 years isn't that much of a gap if you're 20+, I think 12-15 would start to be a big dealfeel free to experience it yourself.please,be my guest.
you'll see...
Mine were 6 years apart. My wife's were something like 16 or 18 years apart.My parents got 8 year age gap
You'd be surprised. Friend of mine was born when his mom was 16 and father 55 lol, people think his father is his grandpa sometimesa 10-year age cap???
im sorry but that'll NEVER work.unless in a manga...
yup. my parents have an 18 yr age gap but they met as grown adults. i do find it a little weird but there's a difference between that and having a child grow up chasing after youThe age gap isn't the issue. The issue is that he knew her when she was in elementary school. There's a difference in meeting someone in their twenties and you being in your thirties than knowing them when they weren't even a teen and you were an adult. There's no way I could do that. That's definitely off-putting.
We're not expressly talking about you. We're also not talking about reality, so we don't have to approach it as straightforwardly as we would reality.Sorry there's no way I--
Yeah.. I already responded to someone else that I would have set boundaries while she was in her childhood. So don't know why you didn't see that. And I posted my comment as it was my first time reading the series. I no longer read it as it's not for me but I am entitled to my opinion just like you are to yours.We're not expressly talking about you. We're also not talking about reality, so we don't have to approach it as straightforwardly as we would reality.
We get it, you wouldn't go for it. Not even the male lead is inclined to go for it, which is the point of this chapter. He's going to end up being pursued by this younger person he incidentally met when she was in elementary school until he lets himself be taken. In the meanwhile, it's the younger party being the pursuer-- practically an underdog in this situation, which is the intended draw (along with her having embodied this "ikemen"-esque personality that lends itself to role reversal despite their ages).
Geez... this premise is ancient, and I don't remember people griping about it like this in the aughts. Can't remember if people just had the courtesy-to-self back then to not torture themselves with material they knew they didn't like, or they weren't so sanctimonious that they would keep reading material they knew they didn't like so they could publicly gripe about how "creepy" they found it.
On the fifth chapter. Well after the whole premise was established and reiterated at least once.And I posted my comment as it was my first time reading the series.
What do the circumstances of the male lead have to do with what I said. I said that I would set boundaries as an adult to the child so that they would understand. Also the reason why I read to chapter five as the chapters are only like 2-3 pages each and I think that there were only five chapters so I read them. I left the comment and stopped reading since then. I could understand if I kept reading and leaving the same comment but I didn't so I don't know why you feel the need to police the comment section but you do you. As I already said I have dropped the series. So posting further would make no sense.On the fifth chapter. Well after the whole premise was established and reiterated at least once.
That comment wasn't made because I objected to you not liking the story. It was made because 1) your continued talk about what you would do missed the circumstance of the male lead (who is himself averse to the situation), and 2) it's baffling that people would persist in reading things they already know they won't like given the premise, then make sure everyone continues to know they don't like it on account of the premise-- and yet I could swear that it's been happening more and more.
Why should one care? What does that have to do with the un-ideal (and narratively hackneyed) decision the male lead made, that was responsible for engendering the premise of the story as it is?What do the circumstances of the male lead have to do with what I said. I said that I would set boundaries as an adult to the child so that they would understand.
You wouldn't understand in that circumstance. A person who would understand that, wouldn't even get to the point of doing that to begin with. What's more, you did it after the premise was established and re-iterated no less than three times-- you did keep reading. Surely it doesn't have to be six times before the tendency merits being called out.I could understand if I kept reading and leaving the same comment
a 10-year age cap???
Entitlement being the operative word here.but I am entitled to my opinion just like you are to yours.