Mangadex to purge titles for legal reasons

Group Leader
Joined
Jan 26, 2018
Messages
262
Eh, I don't view groups as owning that copyright. Right to Translation is owned by either the authors or the publishers (depending on the contract). It's covered in the Berne Convention.
Okay if the scanlators don't have the copyright to their own translation, then the authors or publishers do, then power uploaders clearly don't, so by mangadex's own rules, they, who were never involved at any point whatsoever clearly have no right uploading anything.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,004
presumption
This is how I've always understood the situation. Their legal team received specific titles that violated the clause. They removed them immediately to avoid legal action. Titles were removed completely because their covers were part of the problem. Comparing it to the DMCA purge is accurate as titles were removed with no notice that time, as well. Only difference is the removal of pages because of the covers.

Banning users for making mass reports is the staff preventing you from cutting off your nose just to spite your face (but it's also rule breaking behavior). You want the content here, they want the content here (staff expressed disappointment on discord). They're just not willing to go to jail for you (literally from staff on discord "The immediate concern is not going to jail").

Take it from someone who's been here since the beginning. Users are making a mountain out of a mole hill here. This is smaller than the Jaimini's Box tantrum. This is smaller than the hacked site. This is smaller than MD being down for a year+. This is smaller than the DMCA purge.

so by mangadex's own rules, they, who were never involved at any point whatsoever clearly have no right uploading anything.
Users upload chapters of their own volition. Staff are free to work independently with user groups. That may be why you see staff upload chapters to MD. Telling staff that they can't scanlate anymore just because they volunteered to moderate comment sections would be stupid.

Good that you're here, what happened to the English chapters for Kumika no Mikaku? Your group scanlated and uploaded those chapters. Some folks were asking about it a page or two ago.
 
Contributor
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
1,523
This is smaller than the Jaimini's Box tantrum. This is smaller than the hacked site. This is smaller than MD being down for a year+. This is smaller than the DMCA purge.
Ah, Jaimini's Box, now that was a huge drama clusterfuck.

And for the most part I agree with the rest. In the big picture, losing a handful of titles isn't a huge problem.

What is a huge problem is:
  • the attitude NamiComi staff has towards the MD user community
  • the hyprocracy of the staff's official communications on the matter
  • the complete lack of transparancy regarding the whole affair
  • the fact that the non-NamiComi MD staff seem to no longer be in control of their own community
  • the fact that they (presumably) caved to UK legal complaints because MD is now a registered business in the UK (when did that happen and why?)
  • and perhaps most importantly, the precedent this sets for the future
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 18, 2019
Messages
1,258
MangaDex is a UGC platform and upholds applicable law, including copyright law. This has always been the case, from removals like One Piece, Demon Slayer, and My Hero Academia earlier this decade, to the large removal in May 2025 and the thousands of removals since then. The company does not have data prior to April 2025, but anything since will be added to the Transparency Report in our Copyright Centre shortly: https://mangadex.org/copyright/transparency

Can you please stop trying to bullshit us, the copyright holders, and yourselves? 90% or more of the content on this site is pirated content that you have no legal basis to be hosting and displying, and you know it. If you actually followed through on all your talk, you wouldn't have a website.
I cannot believe you had the gall to actually make that post.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
10,474
Unrelated. But I have small suspicion that Mangadex subreddit temporary lockdown also related to this?
Cookies can tell where they go to as cookies can also tell MD how much and how frequent are the prawns we eat here.

Aside from that, Xenforo looks government owned. I would not wonder if they would bend as quick gays.
 
Double-page supporter
Joined
Aug 18, 2024
Messages
15
Banning users for making mass reports is the staff preventing you from cutting off your nose just to spite your face (but it's also rule breaking behavior). You want the content here, they want the content here (staff expressed disappointment on discord). They're just not willing to go to jail for you (literally from staff on discord "The immediate concern is not going to jail").

Take it from someone who's been here since the beginning. Users are making a mountain out of a mole hill here. This is smaller than the Jaimini's Box tantrum. This is smaller than the hacked site. This is smaller than MD being down for a year+. This is smaller than the DMCA purge.
Considering how an admin called those opposing the takedowns pedophiles, I can't agree that the staff as a whole also want the content here. The problem we have now is that an admin who thinks some of the content here is reprehensible now has just cause to delete it. If this clause in the rules was only to cover their own ass from legal issues then the response should have been much different. Then we could respect that this is an unfortunate situation and not try to "help." But as it stands, no one should be banned for aiding this admin.

As for them not willing to go to jail for us, that's a poor excuse. They know that they are building a pirate site so they should have been setting things up to be as immune to DMCA and other takedowns as possible since otherwise they risk the entire site being nuked overnight. Having to follow takedown requests due to the content rather than only copyright shows that this site is even more vulnerable than we thought.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
2,004
literally a college student but it's been a while since i read from the beginnning
Only explanations I can think of would be that at the beginning of the story she's still in her last year of high school (she does seem to mature and age throughout the chapters), the nightmares the father has are of her when she's younger, the coworker's "wall of art" could reasonably have loli in it, or it's just a mis-tagged entry (of which there are many).

You could always report it with "Information to Correct" and provide proof it's a mis-tag.

edit: also what a freaky, scary read.

the complete lack of transparancy regarding the whole affair
This is really the only actual problem in my eyes. The rest of the bullet points are built on user presumptions spawned from that lack of transparency. I can reason away the initial lack of transparency as being due to sheer urgency, but it's a poor decision to try and provide all the requested transparency at once in one big "Wall O' Text." It just takes too long. Though, I think they are too understaffed to provide frequent updates, as well. Bit of a Catch-22.

They should be prioritizing transparency for the most recent removals and then get to the DMCA purge transparency as time allows.

I don't feel owed any transparency outside what titles/chapters were removed (transparency page includes who requested the removal).

@darkdepths I'll respond to you after a while. I don't wanna double post, but there are some explanations (and clarifications on my part) for your concerns.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
333
You're conflating two different arguments.

No one suggests that playing GTA makes you a murderer. The difference is that violent games do not center on sexualizing children. That's an unfair comparison.

The issue at hand isn't "it's just pixels, so jail forever.” The issue is that sexual content involving minors, even if fictional, normalizes and feeds attraction to minors. That’s why many countries treat it seriously. It’s not about protecting drawings. it's about protecting real kids and not creating demand for that kind of material.

Also, calling people slurs and writing paragraphs full of extreme examples doesn’t make the argument stronger. It just makes it look emotional.

You can debate the law and harm without pretending it’s the same thing as running people over in a video game.
Playing reset-the-clock, are we? 🤔
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
10,474
Do you have any idea how long i have been searching for the name of this anime , the only thing i remembered was something about a dude looking like the detective from psycho pass

thanks my dude
Well, at first it was revolting to me when I was watching it in college, a 37 yo old man having kissed by a 16 yo girl in a drug trance. It was barfing.

However as I watched it a decade later and another decade later, I realized. Damn society is THAT!!
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
10,474
When I hear Girls on Film music by Duran Duran on Broadcast OG Speed Grapher, I always remember Eps steen.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
214
Please give us a list of the titles that you removed.
You said it 59, but how many chapters have been wiped out with those titles ?
Who is this so called "legal nexus" you referred to earlier?

Keeping us in the dark or feeding us nothingburger corpo talk just will spark more insecurity, assumptions and speculations.
You are making it worse.

Imagine more groups remove their uploads. You will be left with an empty website and nothing to sell.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top