Ogami-san Can’t Keep It In - Vol. 4 Ch. 21 - Can't Be A Wolf

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls It's not your sincerity that I'm doubting, but your intelligence in general.

Obviously the budget still needs to accommodate the food bills since they stayed the same, so the food bill still needs to be discussed when it comes to the budget. Imagine if the government were to be comparing the current budget with a hypothetical budget, and both budgets share the same overinflated food bill, but everything else is different, and they are seeking opinions as to what's the problem. Is no one going to point out that the problem is not with everything else, but on the overinflation of the food bill? Thinking really has never been your strong suit, so don't try to push it, lest it makes you look even more retarded than you currently are.

I continue to comment at my own pleasure at pointing out inconsistencies in logic and common sense in the likes of you. I don't care if you could actually learn from your mistakes, since it is quite apparent that you lack the mental faculties to do so.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls When the speaker is an idiot who doesn't even know what is the main problem, of course he should be ignored. Yes, the overinflated food bill stays the same, hence why the problem remains, and is identified as the overinflation of the food bill. Duh.

You can't find common sense in the dictionary, unfortunately for you.

Yes, keep the stupid flowing!

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls When the speaker specifically asked to discuss the main problem, speaking about the main problem obviously couldn't be avoided.

I don't call anyone a retard just because they wanted to talk about the wrong issue or made a mistake. I call people retards when they try to act smarter than they actually are.

>If only I could be as great as you.

You can't.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Here's what you said:

Imagine if I lived in the UK or any other country that uses the term "aircon" for my entire life. Despite that fact, it is entirely possible that I might never have heard the term. That would be my life experiences and exposure, and yet, I could still say the same thing that I said earlier.

But you don't care. You make the judgment of "ignorance" without caring at all because oh, it's so obvious that I'm ignorant, according to you. You don't have to care about what the facts of the situation are. You can just ignore facts.

Of course, I explained exactly why I don't care about your life experiences and exposure, and I made it clear as to why they are irrelevant to me calling both the real you and the hypothetical you ignorant, and thus I am not ignoring facts.

To reiterate:
To you, the main problem is that I am ignoring facts.
So in order to address what you have brought up ("You can just ignore facts") I identified the issue (basis for calling you ignorant) and separated it from what is irrelevant (the life experiences and exposure of the hypothetical you) to determine that there were no facts relevant to my judgement of you as ignorant that I have actually ignored.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls I thought I made myself clear that it doesn't matter how many Flat Earthers or Anti-Vaxxers are making the same assertion, they would still be wrong? You're not one of them, are you?

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls
>It doesn't matter that those are objective issues that could be answered by empirical observations.

Of course it does.

>Whether or not someone is clear is objective! It's so obvious!

That's what I've been saying this whole time. It's only not obvious to those who lack a proper grasp of the English language.

>You decide!

I don't decide how stupid you are.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls But we're not talking about "it". We're talking specifically about how your life experiences and exposure are absolutely irrelevant to calling you ignorant based on the assertion you made which contradicts actual facts. There is no ambiguity here. Interpretations can be objective or subjective depending on the purpose of the interpretation. For legal and judgemental purposes, interpretation is objective. Hence why we have laws. Lawyers would argue based on the circumstances, but the letter of the law is objective and binding. Oh, perhaps I should mention that I also previously worked at a law firm prior to becoming a teacher.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Of course it matters if we're talking about "it" or something more specific. But we were not talking about "it" so that's my point.

Argumentum ab auctoritate is inapplicable here so I don't get why you even brought it up at all. I never said that I'm automatically right about what is clear and what isn't simply because I had worked at a law firm before becoming a teacher. Kindly do not misunderstand why I mentioned my work experiences: I mentioned that I had worked at a law firm in order to inform you that I am well versed in objective interpretation; I mentioned that I was a teacher in order to shame you to your face for your ignorance of the English language compared to the little children I have taught before.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Well in comparison to a nobody like you who has repeatedly demonstrated failures in reading comprehension and a below average grasp of the English language, of course I have more say in what is and isn't clear. I can't be blamed for when an idiot misunderstands what I said based on their own ignorance. Your error is the black and white fallacy: just because some aspects of language are subjective, you think all aspects of language are, which is objectively false. Again, I already made clear which aspects of language are objective, so it's not like you have any more excuses to be this stupid.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls I don't need to know your station in life. I just need to know your linguistic capability, and it is well below average. And your life experiences are still irrelevant here, just like the life experiences of Flat Earthers and Anti-Vaxxers.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Stop pretending like one other random user here represents "everyone else". That's just pathetic.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Again, you are making assertions out of ignorance. On what basis do you say that no real life person has supported my position? The beauty of objectivity is that it does not depend on the number of people supporting it to be right.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls No, every statement you made that starts with the "I should just ignore..." or "it doesn't matter..." is still an assertion. Very ignorant ones, at that. And what you have is an argument from personal incredulity, and the black and white fallacy again. Language is subjective at times and objective at times. It cannot be all subjective all the time, or else there is no rhyme or reason why I should take you for what you intended. In fact, if you want to argue that language is subjective, then it is still in my favour because your disagreement with me still means nothing.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls How do you determine that I do not have the support of anyone else?

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Ah, so all you have is just an argument from ignorance. How fitting.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls The number of people supporting either side in this very limited forum is meaningless, of course. Get rid of mangadex777 and you have no one on your side either, except they also called you retarded.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls I didn't say zero is greater than one, but in terms of determining which side is correct, in this instance, the numbers do not matter since they are hardly representative of the common public.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Whether I am the ultimate arbiter of truth, objectivity, and of whether I am clear is absolutely irrelevant to the fact that whether or not there is anyone here in this dead thread supporting me doesn't matter since you're still objectively wrong.

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls Does the fact that you have just one random person arbitrarily supporting your bullshit make you proud? Why do you keep repeating the same irrelevant lines over and over? Did you break?

 

[Maiorem]

@givemersspls You didn't answer my question. Do you even have any meaningful support to begin with?