Okiraku Ryoushu no Tanoshii Ryouchi Bouei ~Seisan-kei Majutsu de Na mo na Kimura wo Saikyou no Jousai Toshi ni~ - Vol. 3 Ch. 16.3

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Messages
2,288
Well either that or really this

I forgot the exact case, but that the gist of it, or u can ask directly on their site...

You're missing the point. No matter what they say, nobody's getting a DMCA strike for uncensored boobs because DMCA is ONLY about copyright violation. And inappropriate boobs are not a violation of copyright. The scanlation is a copyright violation even with the censorship because it took the work without permission, modified it (via translation) and re-distributed it with no consent given by the author or owner. Taking a way the cleavage lines does not alter that fact.

If the group is saying it's a DMCA strike they're wrong, or someone's messing with them, or there's a language barrier issue at play or something. Because if they were chastised for visible boob lines then the most obvious thing I can think of that would earn them that ire is that their host has restrictions on the appropriateness of content and doesn't allow any lewd images even if they're non-nude.

Getting busted for posting saucy boob pics and calling it DMCA would be like getting caught shoplifting and telling everyone you got a speeding ticket.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Messages
1,181
There's a pop/soda debate? And I thought I was a nerd... That takes some depressing levels of OCD to get worked up over...

But yeah, generic use of "inappropriate" terms is common, especially in non-native speaking areas in any language.
And while copyright laws still have some logic to them, censorship laws elevated to the same level ( and there's soooooo many places that have those...) are as illogical and varied as there are cultural taboos.
Cleavage.... I can think of several places where hosting stuff containing it can get you into trouble. Indonesia and China come to mind, I believe Korea has some things against it as well. Anywhere Islamic for sure. Russia has some surprising Indecent Conduct regs that can and will be used against you if you don't have the right Friends. Same for Poland...

Plenty of places that aren't Kansas, dear Dorothy...
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
1,279
holy shait, all those dmca just for some lines on boobies??? geez

is it even really the original owner making those dmca claim?? i heard too many fake dmca claim these days, especially in yt
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
4,487
You're missing the point. No matter what they say, nobody's getting a DMCA strike for uncensored boobs because DMCA is ONLY about copyright violation. And inappropriate boobs are not a violation of copyright. The scanlation is a copyright violation even with the censorship because it took the work without permission, modified it (via translation) and re-distributed it with no consent given by the author or owner. Taking a way the cleavage lines does not alter that fact.
Why r u so sure that cant get a DMCA over that matter?
?.?...
It's the author work, it's their DMCA right, so if they want they can let it pass over several condition that they put...
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
4,487
holy shait, all those dmca just for some lines on boobies??? geez

is it even really the original owner making those dmca claim?? i heard too many fake dmca claim these days, especially in yt
I only read it over some comment on the previous chapter, that's what they say...

Usually until the scanlators team sure that the claim legit, they will ignore it or just take some measure...
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Messages
2,288
Why r u so sure that cant get a DMCA over that matter?
?.?...
It's the author work, it's their DMCA right, so if they want they can let it pass over several condition that they put...

Because even with the boobs censored the scanlation is still a copyright violation. And no media holder's going to allow someone to steal their work on the condition that they erase some cleavage lines. The DMCA is entirely about copyright. It is not about the nature of the content, only about the fact that it was used without consent. And if it was used with consent with conditions, then that's still not a DMCA takedown, that's a separate issue.

To be perfectly clear I'm not saying the group didn't receive some sort of complaint for the content. But if the answer to the complaint was to censor the boobs then the complaint itself had to do with the nature of the content and not its copyright status. Instead it seems more likely wherever they are or are hosting their work has restrictions on what they're allowed to put out, and something sexual, even as low-grade sexual as cleavage, is disallowed.

The other explanation that seems most likely is that this group is not a set of native English speakers and they have taken the term "DMCA" to mean "somebody stopped us from doing something." in a far broader context than it actually implies. They have equated copyright takedowns to any sort of content restriction simply because DMCA takedowns are among the most well-known and widespread types of content control on the internet.

I realize this looks somewhat pedantic to argue over, but getting terms used correctly matters because it prevents misunderstandings like this and makes sure people can communicate. I also don't think I'm going to get into it anymore because I only intended to be an offhand comment that would take a couple minutes, not require me to come back and argue the case in circles over the course of multiple hours.

There's a pop/soda debate? And I thought I was a nerd... That takes some depressing levels of OCD to get worked up over...

But yeah, generic use of "inappropriate" terms is common, especially in non-native speaking areas in any language.
And while copyright laws still have some logic to them, censorship laws elevated to the same level ( and there's soooooo many places that have those...) are as illogical and varied as there are cultural taboos.
Cleavage.... I can think of several places where hosting stuff containing it can get you into trouble. Indonesia and China come to mind, I believe Korea has some things against it as well. Anywhere Islamic for sure. Russia has some surprising Indecent Conduct regs that can and will be used against you if you don't have the right Friends. Same for Poland...

Plenty of places that aren't Kansas, dear Dorothy...

It's not so much a "debate" as there's long existed a map of the US (and sometimes parts of Canada) that demonstrates the use of the various terms for soft drinks in different areas. I don't think anyone gets worked up over it as it seems like most of the northwest and central US uses "pop", the northeast uses "soda", and the southwest leans "soda" but is less clear cut. What I was mostly wanting to poke fun at was that there's this swath of southern states from New Mexico to the Carolinas where apparently the most popular term is "coke". For all soft drinks. Even the ones that aren't actual Coke. Yes, even when it's Pepsi.

That is mind-bendingly weird. I just can't process someone saying "what kind of coke do you want? We've got sprite, fanta, root beer, mountain dew, and pepsi."

I know that some brand names become genericized like kleenex or xerox, but those are cases when the item is mostly indistinguishable from its competitors (a kleenex tissue is not fundamentally different from made by charmin or royale or any other brand. If you hand someone a photocopy I would defy them to tell you what brand of machine it was made on, or at least label it Xerox or not) but soft drink flavors are distinctive, and Coke is a very specific subset of flavor, so imagining it happening to other products feels so odd.

"Hey kids! You want some dominoes? I can order in from Pizza Hut!"
 
Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2023
Messages
24
For people that think that MC Skill is USELESS

oh boy, you've had no idea..
MC is literally living factory
he able to build town in single night if he want
plus with his personality it's just matter of time that people drawn to him
The thing is - and this is something common to a lot of these, and often not well addressed past chapter 1 or 2, is that it usually IS useless...
Because in order to do/make things like this, you have to have a mana capacity so huge you'd be the best mage ever regardless of what you had talent for. There's not MC cleverness in it, the protag just has a bajillion mana and that's what makes his magic OP. It's a frustration to me over this trope because it inverts the meaning of "what was thought to be useless is actually useful" into "when you are ungodly powerful, then you can make useless things useful"
 
Power Uploader
Joined
Aug 11, 2020
Messages
1,881
My galaxy-brain take is that they censored the boobs not to skirt any sort of takedown or content restriction, but just to distract from the fact that the quality of the scans has degraded significantly
5head strategy
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
4,019
So the loli also has a "useless" magic ability. I hope she will become the main heroine and won't grow much.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
631
Thanks for the translation :thumbsup:
Ujzxnrz.gif
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 19, 2023
Messages
7,095
I wonder what the actual number of these types of stories are out there, specifically the whole "My specific ability is deemed by society to be completely useless but it's actually the most powerful ability ever"
There was a time before all of these where a bunch of animes had characters who were ranked the lowest for some equally stupi reason despite being able to defeat the top ranks. It's not exactly a new concept to artificially claim someone is an underdog because underdogs are popular, when the character is actually the top contender, assuming it's even a contest in the first place.

There are also a few where the character does actually have some absurd limitation (only level 1, HP 1, etc), but those also usually become irrelevant halfway through chapter one. Though to be fair, the HP 1 guy actually got killed by getting beaned in the head by a soap (he got better).


Also, censoring boobs is dumber than anything in this story. Especially the above.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
498
that Arut little girl, you can see it in her eyes, she also has a "useless" magic affinity and now her common sense is getting smashed after seeing MC completelly owning the place XD
(also, LMAO more than half the comments here are about the censored clevage, mah men XDDD)
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
2,835
My guess is their host or group leaders are in a censorship crazy country like China, where they often white-out cleavages and butt cracks. And the group is interchanging "dmca" with a censorship warning. Unless there really is some kind of threat from the original publisher telling them to downgrade their proofreading and boobies.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 5, 2023
Messages
942
Here comes the third harem member (and probably official wife since they're nobles), a girl with "useless skill" like the MC.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Messages
350
For people that think that MC Skill is USELESS

oh boy, you've had no idea..
MC is literally living factory
he able to build town in single night if he want
plus with his personality it's just matter of time that people drawn to him
I think the two main reasons is because the kingdom is expanding and they need attack skills, along with the fact that people with his ability have a lot less magic than him
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Messages
350
I think someone pointed out that it's the translator group doing this, because the raws aren't censored like that. Which honestly makes even less sense.
Someone said it’s because their site has ads and the type of ads wouldn’t want something that shows too much on the site. Otherwise they’d (whoever owns a ad) not host their ads there

Edit: i think someone may have already said this
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Messages
350
This makes infinitely more sense than all the claims that it's a DMCA thing.
Could also be country restrictions for what’s allowed wherever they’re hosting from, but the ads not wanting anything revealing would probably be more reasonable/ make more sense as you say
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top