We don't know what building that is, but we do know it is not in the city. It's probably the orphanage, though maybe it's the guild master's estate when he's teaching them magic (the guild master who teaches them magic and the alchemist noble are different people. Just noticed).
Page 10 Panel 1 I see no cracks, but I do see shading (to indicate night time). I also see a door too nice for a back alley shady part of town. Panel 5 I do see what could be considered cracks (only 2 though) mixed among the shading, but cracks would be common in a city as big and old as the capital. Cracks can manifest over time due to shifts in weather and moisture.
So yes, I do think shops in a shopping district would have cracks. If the artist/author wanted us to think this area of town was shady, they would have included
much more obvious signs. Boarded up windows, beggars sleeping on the street, garbage in the streets. We see none of that.
PHYSICAL abuse had not started but she was already verbally abusing him.
If you consider a remark as benign as "bratty" as verbally abusive I can't help you. That's such a low bar. She's calling him childish (bratty -> like a brat -> like a child -> childish) because he's comparing their new living arrangement and workshop to a "secret hideout." It's literal child behavior from Lloyd and she's teasing him about it.
You can also compare how Ruby treats Lloyd here with how she treats him in earlier chapters (especially chapter 1). She's happy and excited to do the quest and Hecate Light plan together with Lloyd. Very, very different from how she treats him later. Which is why I'm so confident she wasn't abusing him yet and his self esteem issues are his own.
Page 8 he references the incident of page 7 where he used bread to bait him into becoming an assistant mage.
This is a call back to chapter 1 page 16 and 17. Using the bread as bait is entirely Lloyd's interpretation and doesn't take into account the context of the scene. Ruby gave Lloyd her bread because he was crying due to being hungry. She explains that she'll become an alchemist and eat all the bread she wants and then all but offers to bring Lloyd with her.
We also see that same building again with it's iron fence which is neat of the author to keep that continuity.
I don't think we're meant to take any of what Ruby and Lloyd are saying to each other in chapter 20 as honest. They are both highly emotional and being dishonest with themselves and each other. Not to mention Ruby is currently fused with a bunch of monsters and a super evil demon who hates Lloyd.
intelligent and has a pretty high level of awareness
Being intelligent and aware of danger does not equate to having the emotional intelligence to pick up on the feelings of others. This is Lloyd's flaw with Ruby.
Also the hit didn't knock her off her feet. What is getting mad going to do?
Uh, so what if it didn't knock her off her feet?? He hit her hard enough to leave a mark on her face. Standing up for your friend when they've been hit in the face can be anything from punching him back (ill advised) to yelling at him not to do that again. Yelling at the shopkeep isn't going to hurt them in any capacity especially since they probably never went back to him. Lloyd doesn't stand up for her at all and it's incredibly disappointing.
she's not his childhood 'friend'.
By Lloyd's own account they are childhood friends (ch.6 page 14) and lovers (ch.1 page1). I wonder if the lovers thing has been retconned/thrown away?
They didn't change as people
I like that you brought this up because it does play into her world view. Ruby's idea of "handling" someone who looks down on her only applies to herself because she was selfish and immature like a child would be (arrested development perhaps?). So improving her station so that the alchemy shopkeep and the noble's daughter can not look down on her solves the class disparity for herself, but not anyone else.
Her worldview is flawed no doubt about it. But it's not her feelings towards class disparity that are the issue, it's that she's only looking to solve the issue for herself and Lloyd. I'd bet this shifts to just herself when she realizes Lloyd doesn't actually share that sentiment with her. He's fine being an orphan or being poor as long as he's full, warm, and having fun.
When I said you were misunderstanding her, I thought you were originally referring to her arguing back with the shopkeep. Arguing with the shopkeep isn't really what she was talking about when she said she knew how to handle people like that.
And if Ruby suggested going to that shop she probably talked big about getting the best deal there or something of the like. Imagine talking up this "great place you found" and then it turns out to be 100% a scam. That hurts your ego.
This is entirely something you fabricated, though. All we have to go by is the aftermath. They go on a quest together and then head to a shop to sell a potion they've made together (we can maybe infer the quest and potion are related). The shopkeep undercuts them and when confronted about it he backhands Ruby (hits her right cheek with his right hand and her head turns left). Instead of defending his friend, Lloyd does nothing, then later tries to shift the blame of the offending party onto themselves insinuating that this potion they made together was somehow their fault.
Lloyd is not trying to protect Ruby's ego here. He is letting his pre-existing self-esteem issues get the better of him.
I interpret that "we" as in everyone at orphanage as a whole. So I don't believe he's thinking specifically of himself and Ruby.
I hate this Pot-au-feu / None of that indicates she doesn't actually like it
Well, the italics are your addition, and we can gather from context clues later this chapter and in previous chapters that she hates all pot-au-feu.
chapter 6 is AFTER the incident
I brought it up because it's relevant to the story. Not necessarily because it's helpful to my argument.
I think you're right that it happens after, but I don't think all your arguments surrounding it are sound.
I don't think she was trying to stop Lloyd from eating/liking pot-au-feu by stealing his sausage. We don't know why she did that at all. It could be that the sausage is the only part of that meal she eats. It could be that she used to eat the dish and then stopped once she realized what pot-au-feu meant to her.
I think the sausage line is not all that important, actually.
What we do know is that in her eyes, it was clear she despised the dish. Whether she never ate the dish or just ate the sausages, it doesn't matter. She was visibly treating that dish differently than others.
I think it's definitely possible that Ruby projected her internalizd shame and anger onto the dish and thought Lloyd was the same. It's why that moment with the pot-au-feu feels like such a betrayal to her. She's thinking that even after all this time we strugged to rise above our origins you didn't actually care about all that? Similar to Lloyd, she wasn't picking up on his feelings, though, his easy agreement in going along with her plans probably masked this to her.
If he didn't help Ruby and Lloyd would've never learned the skills
We don't know that. We know he donated money and we know the guild master is who taught them magic. I'd bet they are unrelated.
the orphanage probably would've shut down and they'd be on teh street
I don't know where you're getting this idea from. Nothing in the story has indicated that the orphanage was on the verge of shutting down before the alchemist noble's donation.
The only thing shown in the flashbacks is that they were gloating.
That's all we need, though. Gloating is literally bragging about your success and someone's misfortune. They've come there to gloat to a bunch of orphand children about how much money they have to spare.
Additionally, they're teaching them the "value of mercy" while doing so. Note how it's not the value of
charity. Meaning they believe these children require mercy from some kind of punishment. A punishment can only be given out after a wrong has been committed. The only "wrong" these children have committed which would put them in this orphanage is losing their parents or being abandoned by them.
Following this logic, the noble's view these children as deserving their lot in life for something entirely out of their control. It's a vile point of view by the nobles.
We can also look to the politics of this kingdom. We know the queen values "elegance" above all else and that it applies to presentation. The nobles dress stylishly for her, she forces the main characters to wear "elegent" clothing, etc. (ch 10)
We also don't need to exclusively pull from the context of this story when it comes to how nobles treat those below them. All stories are informed by the real world when being written so we can look to our own world's history when trying to ascertain the motives and morals of these nobles.