Osananajimi Kanojo no Morahara ga Hidoin de Zetsuen Sengen shite Yatta - Vol. 3 Ch. 28.1

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 21, 2023
Messages
351
I am like 99% sure that it doesn't matter what MC does. That bitch and her lackeys will surely push an agenda, that will make MC the bag guy, especially that MC probably will not say anything about the fake message to lure him out and kidnap him and tie him to a tree, and even if he will probably only the best girl will believe him, and maybe a part of his class, but not many more.

Cause any other scenario would basically mean that her "manipulations" came to light and the story could end with a fluffy romance between MC and best girl, assuming author wont try to milk the story with new dramas.
 
Contributor
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
236
Ok so like she's been portrayed as a real bitch, but especially lately her tactics have mostly come off as kind of goofy. I really don't think we needed some fucked up satisfaction from seeing her foot broken and turned 180 degrees.

Kinda out of left field with this one author.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
3,524
I've been complaining about how stupid this series is since the very beginning, It would be wrong for me to be mad at the MC for helping her in a situation like this.

abandoning someone in a critical situation is a crime.
In the US, at least, it is not.

When Should I NOT Be a Good Samaritan?

The duty to rescue

Generally speaking, there is legally no duty to rescue another person.

The courts have gone into very gory details in order to explain this. In Buch v. Amory Manufacturing Co., the defendant had no obligation to save a child from crushing his hand in a manufacturing machine. The court suggested an analogy in which a baby was on the train tracks – did a person standing idly by have the obligation to save him? Legally, no. He was a “ruthless savage and a moral monster,” but legally he did not have to save that baby.

An interesting and solid case to the contrary is Soldano v. O’Daniels, where the Court of Appeals of California bucked convention and stated that an employee did have a duty to help.

In that case, a Good Samaritan requested that a store employee use the phone to call the police, as a person was being threatened in a bar across the street. The employee denied the use of the phone to the Good Samaritan and refused to place the call himself. The person ended up dying, and the Court said, enough is enough. This person would not have died if that call had been placed, and someone has to take responsibility. They felt it was time to reexamine the traditional relationship of responsibility.

Normally, however, there is no duty to rescue. Soldano is a unique quirk in the legal system that has not overcome the four categories of duties, which we shall now discuss.

Legal categories of duty​

When someone is in peril, injured or somehow incapacitated, there are certain situations in which a duty to rescue is pre-established. In these cases, reasonable assistance would need to be provided, and failing to come to the rescue of these parties would be grounds for liability.
  1. The defendant created the peril: If it was the person’s own negligence that created this situation, then he’d better figure a way out of it – and get the plaintiff out of it, too.
  2. There is a special relationship: This is a parent-child relationship, student-teacher relationship, inmate-correctional officer, or the like. If one has a special relationship with the other, then they are responsible for the other as well.
  3. They undertook an action: As we said in the beginning of this article, let’s say someone was drowning way out at sea. You decide to run out and be a hero, desperately swimming to meet your flailing friend. The other people on shore look at your churning limbs and think, “Wow, okay, he’s got this.” They decide not to intervene because of your actions. Halfway to your friend, your side cramps up and you realize, with a sinking feeling, that you can’t make it. You can’t do it. Your friend drowns, and nobody else helped because they thought you had control of the situation. Once a person begins a rescue, they have an obligation to finish it. If you fail to render aid, well... you blew it.
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
41
Guys, Hanabi is bad for sure. But damn, have a bit of humanity. XD. That said, he does have to leave her. He can't carry her back up, so she'll just have to sit in that darkness for a bit in excruciating pain while he goes to get help. Bet she'll learn her lesson though.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
143
Ik she treated him horribly, and that injury is 100% deserved. But actually contemplating leaving her in that state is kinda psychotic
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jul 8, 2023
Messages
2,384
That twisted ankle alone is a good karma-nudge for Hanabi.

I really LOLed when MC nonchalantly decided to just go leave her to get help :LOL:
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 18, 2018
Messages
145
What are the odds this trash actually had the balls to give her such a serious injury that she has to be taken away in an ambulance, probably hospitalized for surgery, and out of commission for weeks? As opposed to the mangaka just having failed at human anatomy...
Sure this series has surprised me before, but it's disappointed me far more often.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Aug 2, 2020
Messages
1,272
Oh damn she might be dea-

Oh no worries she's AOKYyyyyooooooOoOOOOOOO! FUCKING FEET DONT FACE THAT WAY :shamihuh: :shamihuh: :shamihuh:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top