I feel like some people forget that SCPs are written by many different authors, so the definition of what an SCP is varies just as much.
Many SCPs tackle very differing kinds and levels of weirdness, weebness in this case.
Like, I prefer the ones where the author tries to show how a very specific rule set of an SCP is discovered through the foundation trying to contain it. Or the ones where over the course of containment the backstory of an SCP is slowly discovered either through interviews or test. This one does neither well and doesn't feel very interesting to me because of that.