Doesn't this MASSIVELY alter history?? Like now Nobunaga's rule and commands seem far more legitimate which would stop one of the primary motivations behind his assassination.
I’m reminded of the one chapter where Shizuko says that history is written by the victors, and that they will paint you as the bad guy… while the Hiroshima nuclear explosion is shown behind her.
But the thing is that we’ve seen what Japan did in World War II, not only to the US but to places like China and Korea. There are firsthand accounts of that. And Shizuko is acting as if they’re the victims in this whole event.
So I can’t figure out whether the author realizes this and is going “always have a little bit of skepticism with what you follow” or is going “always take everything you read with a grain of salt… unless it’s from me JAPAN FOREVER AAAAAAAAAAAAAA”
The current understanding is that the nukes were an unnecessary display of power. Even if you do buy the idea that a single nuke was necessary to end the war quickly, the second was just the US trying to stroke its peen, and I say that as a US citizen myself.
The author is likely sympathetic to Japan, but the reality is that nobody was the good guy in WWII, it's just that one side was way the hell more bad.