@Snowmanne I beg to differ, while you may indeed believe that they didn't have the intention and that's ok, I can't prove they did otherwise. The invention of hell, and their many tries to convert the Norse(who resisted bravely), seem to prove otherwise. Now I do understand that the Church was not all about corruption, priests and other lower members of the clergy were usually true believers. But I can say that there were indeed ill intentions behind some choices. The Invention of hell itself was one of them. Why would they even use the name hell in the first place? Specially when the Norse religion still exists even to this day, unlike the old greek one that has already died out and it's now just a part of culture and mythology.
As a matter of fact I've been doing some research and I've found some weird things about the whole story behind the Ragnarök, someone correct me if I'm wrong or missing any information.
But I believe that this story was created by the Christians and not by the norse themselves. Most paintings and pottery depicting this story features crosses and angels coming after the Ragnarök. Which stengthens my belief that this story doesn't actually belong to the Norse. And was just another tactic to convert the germanic and nordic people
Even though the old norse were stupid(sorry, I don't mean to offend), and never recorded their culture in books or documents, only in poems and songs(which allowed for it to be mostly lost in time or completely changed over time)