Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2018
- Messages
- 2,253
@vereo
Not necessarily dog-eat-dog sort of thing. From my POV, I took it as literally as it was explained: There are a shit ton of low-tier mages, and they don't care to waste them if they're not going to amount to 1st rates, which are far an inbetween. Even though that's an odd statement, given that Frieren stated that "there used to be a LOT more mages walking around, everywhere".
That being said, I can agree it is an astonishingly barbaric method, in which good candidates can be slaughtered merely due to the difference in specialties or by pure luck. That test also motivates people to prioritize deadly spells and cowardly methods (in competitive battleroyal , good luck finding anyone. They all figured out it's the best strat to just hide somewhere until the end of the game. Beh.)
So, yeah. Pretty dumb stuff, which may as well be the point.
@Joco413413
Because it's totally counter-productive. Literally. It reduces the amount of seedlings you may have in the future, because you order them to kill each other.
The monster problem aside, here's a problematic scenario: What if literally all the contestants have the potential to be 1st rate? And then some, or most of them, die to in-fighting? How helpful is that? How "stupid" are they by participating and not "knowing" that they'll face equally strong foes?
The whole test is just stupid once you really think about it. If the academy cared about maximizing their 1st rates, they'd actually have a program to build them up from the ground, and have more standard way of testing individuals, rather than tell people to risk their lives for no reason.
Not necessarily dog-eat-dog sort of thing. From my POV, I took it as literally as it was explained: There are a shit ton of low-tier mages, and they don't care to waste them if they're not going to amount to 1st rates, which are far an inbetween. Even though that's an odd statement, given that Frieren stated that "there used to be a LOT more mages walking around, everywhere".
That being said, I can agree it is an astonishingly barbaric method, in which good candidates can be slaughtered merely due to the difference in specialties or by pure luck. That test also motivates people to prioritize deadly spells and cowardly methods (in competitive battleroyal , good luck finding anyone. They all figured out it's the best strat to just hide somewhere until the end of the game. Beh.)
So, yeah. Pretty dumb stuff, which may as well be the point.
@Joco413413
Because it's totally counter-productive. Literally. It reduces the amount of seedlings you may have in the future, because you order them to kill each other.
The monster problem aside, here's a problematic scenario: What if literally all the contestants have the potential to be 1st rate? And then some, or most of them, die to in-fighting? How helpful is that? How "stupid" are they by participating and not "knowing" that they'll face equally strong foes?
The whole test is just stupid once you really think about it. If the academy cared about maximizing their 1st rates, they'd actually have a program to build them up from the ground, and have more standard way of testing individuals, rather than tell people to risk their lives for no reason.