@midnight2630
"MC likes Georg" and "so she is 'fixing' the capture targets so the heroine can have a good choice." have no relation to each other. she doesn't need to do B to get A.
"because she is a good girl" - Alright, I can get around that.
"don´t want to be locked down by her brother nor have a M relationship..." - There's no must fix it or bad end. She can just... you know, not have it? Nothing's pointing a gun at her, forcing her to indulge them.
The heroine is free to not choose anyone, like MC, and if the heroine did choose someone, maybe she wanted to 'fix' the target herself? Or maybe she just like shitty targets? Either way, the relationship of others have nothing to do with the MC. So "because she is a good girl" is really the only thing? But the description, story and MC's own character is clearly in conflict with that.
Also, the description states that MC's is raising flags (but she's not, because she's not the heroine) and she's destroying them to not get hooked with the losers (Again, not. Because she's not the heroine.). Rather, by fixing them, MC is raising their flags. So, really, author messed up or intentional or both. "Wait, what? I'm the heroine's love rival? No way! I have zero intention of falling in love with any of those losers" - The heroine's the one capturing targets, not the heroine's rival (MC), and MC clearly stated she's not interested, thus becoming not the heroine's rival. I'm leaning towards author had gotten confused.