@Zephyrus
"Frankly", that explanation sounds really disingenuous coming from someone who defends, or defended Kronix' right to use the derogatory words like "pussahs" to refer to female characters, which can easily be extrapolated to straight up sexism and gender objectification, if one was inclined to care enough about autistic internet rambling to do so.
Calling something "gay" is not acceptable because you're equating homosexuality with something bad.
Please provide context for that - there's nothing in "offender's" one word post to indicate his-hers disdain for alternative sexual orientations. Without it, it only seems like you're the one secretly thinking that "homosexuality is bad".
Either that, or you're in the business of assigning intent.
...
With that out of the way, please point out the offended party here, which upon
personal attack was unleashed upon. It really seems like you're willfully taking advantage of the rule's vague formulation to enforce your personal opinions about others and assign intent to their language. Selectively.