Yeah after reading the wiki, I think we should spectrum authoritarianism apart from the
historical political connotations. The definition article on the wiki is too focused on it's relation to conservative fascism and doing mental gymnastics.
Where would absolute monarchies go? Those are Authoritarian, but you can't exactly
call Napoleaon 3's France modern wiki definition conservative Authoritarian because France was the literal
the Origin of Liberalism and modern European Enlightenment/ civil rights.
And Stalinist Communism is definitely left leaning authoritarianism in the world
like the dreaded Chinese communist party of the 1960s. Yet, the article shoves it in as Post-totalitarian authoritarian regimes No, it's just authoritarian. You need all those adjectives cause your wiki article is using Authoritarian as a conservative fascist idea only. Which is dumb.
If anything, Anarchy doesn't fit. That seems more like a lack of government. Seems cowardly to say only
left leaning jackasses love a power vacuum, almost everyone awful loves a power vacuum for coups takeovers.
--------------------------------
Less gov enforcementby force<------------------------> More gov enforcement by force
Anarchy<-----Libertarianism--------> Authoritarianism
*edit: This clearer? IDK. The wikis articles don't fit correctly in my opinion.