tfw between a smug asshole trying to destroy the world and 3 likable idiots trying to destroy the world im taking the smug assholes side of the argument because unless he's torturing people to death or making this overly prolonged there isnt really a 'good' way to commit total, world-wide genocide. him being a smug asshole's reason enough to put a stop to him, but pulling the moral highhorse on him?
really?
sheesh.