You're being intentionally stupid on purpose, which again, implies how much smarter you consider yourself to be in comparison to average mob here ("no one will catch up"). It was meant to serve as an example of certain type of fiction.
I don't follow. I was saying I just had particular tastes and wasn't necessarily diminishing genres for what they are. I'm almost confident that there are extremely well-written Yuri or Yaoi love stories, but they're just not for me. (Also, I find it hypocritical for you to say that I shouldn't share my two cents into this series because it's supposed to be some "silly story," yet you criticize me because I said that I don't read the hentai because I just want to read some interesting and well-written stories.)
I see in no way how I am being intentionally "stupid" here, or how I see myself as smarter or better than anyone else. (Which is just trying to paint me in a negative light rather than have a productive conversation.)
That said, if you really were that intelligent (or had lesser ego), you wouldn't had written the next paragraph, because it kinda kills your whole "rhetoric": by your own admission you don't read titles which interpretation or understanding would presumably require critical thinking
I just said that I don't read Yuri/Yaoi because it's personally not my thing, dude. I can acknowledge that there are probably some really competent and well-written works in those series, whilst still saying it's just not for me. It doesn't mean I don't read titles whose "interpretation or understanding would presumably require critical thinking," which is outright dishonest given I just included two fairly large genres that don't appeal to me, specifically, whilst not degrading them in any form. It also ignores how I have talked about complex works I like on places like the site's forums, but if you're commenting specifically on manga, it's easy to ignore those.
"in exchange you consume whole lot of unsophisticated stuff which lets you project freely and vomit all sort of very loosely associated 'overthought' musings (for lack of a better words), which have nothing to do with either the work's in question themes, context of its genre, or the author's intent to address the issues in serious manner ('meta-context')."
Cite me an example in which I do not try to provide evidence, or cannot provide evidence, from the work itself to support my point. I'm not projecting anything, as I try my best to support my claims with examples and cite events, dialogue, and other factors to help formulate my argument. I also don't care about the "meta-context" because I am a firm believer in death of the author, and just because the creator has one interpretation of the work, it doesn't mean that is the only valid perspective of that work, and whilst knowing the genre and the context of other works within it may help you to better understand a work, (Like how Konosuba parodies the Isekai genre) it does not invalidate my argument about the work, and is pretty much irrelevant if the work, itself, supports the points I'm making or I can pull evidence to support my perspective.
Maybe you really think that rest of us are peasants, but it'd be really nice if you had stopped assuming that.
Lol nope, never claimed that. I never said anything even remotely similar to that, nor have I implied that through tone or diction. It's a wild mischaracterization based on practically nothing other than I have tried to propose possible interpretations of a work.
Just because you get lost midway through a sentence doesn't mean that all people have that same problem.
I said that you had terrible grammar. I could mostly understand the point you were making. (Though I am fallible and I had to go through and fix some parts mentally, which I feel is natural and everyone is prone to do at some point or another.) I find it interesting how you project this onto me, whilst criticize me for projecting things onto others, and how you took me saying that you had made some grammatical mistakes and somehow interpreted to mean that I have have issues reading all sentences in general. It appears to me that you take your own flaws, and then push them onto others, rather than trying to understand what the person talking to you had to say. I think you ought to invest in a mirror.
None of what I said in the "things that are neither here nor there" section is damning evidence against me. I don't think any of the words I used in those sections really speak to any level of pretentiousness, or that I have some grandiose ego. Most of those words are used in common parlance. "Whilst" is not some pompous expression, nor is a word like "existential." It's silly to just point at these banal statements and think they speak to some deeper underlying egoism, when I don't think they really do. (Whilst this is personal, I'll even go as far as to say that I have been to therapists for self-esteem issues most of my life around depression. Narcissistic behavior is one the other end of that particular spectrum.)
"You're so pretentious dude. Which is a trait at least one other person in this thread had caught on to:"
I really don't care. I've already addressed his argument, and just because other people believe in a claim, that does not make that claim true. It's just an appeal to popularity, but it doesn't actually make your argument any stronger.
If you have any other issues, please send me them in a private message. This is straying off-topic from this chapter, which is better sorted there than here, as per the site's rules.