@nananoka Doubling down and saying that every thought that I have is unreality and that I'm racist proves my first response to you correct. You are even using hit dog hollers now? This is getting sad, I had hoped you weren't disingenuous just wrong. Let me walk you through events for you since rereading isn't helping. The first person wrote their post. I responded kindly, sympathetically, and suggested a new view on nice things like "ease of enjoyment" in a similar way that they asked people to "critically think". Then they targeted me specifically in their response, insulting me, personally. I hit back. This is where "I'm upset", you can lie all day that it was earlier, that the original post offended me so deeply. Nothing will change the fact that they attempted to leverage the weight of the first post against me in the second. My response was completely in proportion to the second post. Maybe you are really really off base here and not disingenuous -but instead you're isolating the first post from the second. But its becoming a slimmer and slimmer possibility, and anyways your behavior matters a lot more here. While you may or may not be dissapointed that I'm not a -pff- excuse me I can't believe you actually quoted "hit dog holler" as an authority claim, its cute. But you're demeaning yourself when you attempt to label people who aren't as such ,maliciously or not, because at the end of the day, either you don't want to get anti-racism right -you just want to feel right -and you'll screw other people to do it; or you
can't get anti-racism right -and you want to get anti-racism right- and you'll screw other people to do it. either way I'll refer back to the tl;dr for you: if you wan't to treat others as inferior to be anti-racist, then you missed the point. (i'll expand here for you) Treat others by the golden rule, and take their race out of consideration. I hope you sleep well.
