Ok, I'm really busy today, so I won't answer everything, just point out that you didn't refute my main argument "It's not staying in their bedrooms", and as such, it's a clear-cut case of a slippery slope. The goalpost keeps moving, you can never do enough.
I also would like to point out, that children's movies (infantile audience, as you say, and Disney) influence them, because of the much-studied and scientific human law "What monkey see, monkey does" In other words, children mimic what they see. Even in my city, lots of boys were dressed in pink for the Barbie movie, mimicking what they saw around them, even if usually they wouldn't do it by themselves and preferred playing with little soldiers to Barbie. For most things, as this feminist propaganda gone wrong, I think it's harmless, but the more you show children this LGBT theme, and praise those who are, the more they will imitate it, and who knows that won't induce them to become LGBT too. This trans kids bullshit is really recent, but there are already a lot of people who regretted the transition, but are now scarred for their entire lives. But that's beside the point, my point still is "it's not only their bedrooms", but it's also everywhere.
You are really comparing MLK to the Pride Parade? One defending human rights and the other is public showing fetishes? You really think the LGBTs today are as oppressed as black people were during Jim Crow? Though, if MLK was doing what the BLM is doing now, yep, he would be creating and fomenting the KKK, because that's what happens when you make "fiery but peaceful protests" (And that's not Fox News, that's CNN in the most blatant attempt to sugarcoat an inconvenient truth since they couldn't downright lie, became a meme really). Because people don't like to see their stuff burned. I imagine how many normal people become a little bit more racist after the overdose of George Floyd (and yep, it was an overdose, that knee in the neck didn't help, sure, but the man was already suffering from an overdose). These movements have to decide, Do they want peace or revenge. MLK wanted peace, that's why he didn't ask for anything more, BLM wants money and for that, they seek revenge that they can only try, but never get, but still get paid just for trying. And as a side note, "We're here, we're queer. We're coming for your children!" (in a viral video of a pride parade) doesn't help the cause, it only creates the enemy.
Also, stop this African American bullshit. They are not Africans, they are as much Africans as I am European. They are Americans, like their white neighbors (or United Statians if it bothers you that the US is appropriating the continent's name). This kind of rhetoric only seeds division. Do you see them calling European American? In Brazil is even worse, because here, the mixing of the races was endemic, there isn't a single black person today in Brazil that doesn't have a lot of European/indigenous DNA, and they come with this Afrobrasileiro bullshit, again importing this from the US.
For the last, gays aren't groomers. but... 1 - Groomers exist. 2 - Some groomers are gay. 3 - Being gay or not, groomers love that sexuality is a subject being taught to children younger and younger. They love those books with sexual act depictions in schools, they love that to teach about LGBT, you have to teach them what sex is. They love the LGBT instigating their curious minds about sex, be it straight or not. They love the media pushing back against a movie like Sound of Freedom, which highlights them, just to antagonize the right. They love that they antagonized a law stating that no LGBT theme should be taught to children 3rd grade or less (8-9 years old) and called it "Don't say gay". They love all of that, it makes the job a lot easier.
I'm with Tim Pool here, I don't think gays are groomers, I don't think groomers are the ones pushing the LGBT curriculum, but I don't care if the intention isn't to groom, and I don't care if what they want to do is just to teach respect and avoid the kids becoming homophobes. They are doing the groomer's job for them. And just to antagonize the right, they are supporting the damn pedos. They really should have thought a lot about the consequences of what they were doing. Just because the right is saying something, it doesn't mean it's wrong.
"staying in their bedrooms" never applies to hetero shit, and rarely applies even to odder fetishes (except the most blatantly bad shit. Consider: lolicons and incest. When has that stayed "in the bedroom"? Despite both often having as bad or worse effects.) So this is just double standards. The "goalposts" have been "moving" if you call including more groups and adapting to new info "moving the goalposts," since the 1700s, so this is also more or less moot, unless you want to defend the phrenologists and loyalists/royalists. Hell, even the fucking tsarists. Lmao.
"regretted their transitions" this is an implementation issue, and this kind of implementation cost is more or less going to be paid no matter when you start, as long as you do start (obviously, people should work on it, and guess what, people
are working on it). So basically, the only way to satisfy this condition is to more or less never progress.
shrug if you think that's somehow less "degenerative" or whatever then sure, let's give up on advancing treatment, lol. Shock "therapy" (read: torture) for the win!
"monkey see monkey do" and you're saying traditional gender roles good, nonbinarism bad, and that's the key premise behind this entire argument. Otherwise, if the child
actively wants to, or feels that socially engaging via that is ok, then I don't see the issue. Obviously it's a problem if the parents are forcing their child to do it, but that's a problem of
bad parenting, not LGBT, so that's moot. (Playing solely with soldiers all the time develops HOI brainrot, where your conception of history is about as reliable as a column made out of pudding and about as deep as a puddle, but this is an aside.)
"public showing fetishes" ...??? I mean, cosplay is often a form of 'public showing fetishes' but I don't see you railing against that. As for "rights," there's still mfers who say being LGBT is grounds for shot or executed or whatever. Colorado Springs was a year ago? Where it was ostensibly "in the bedroom" (a pro LGBT club) and yet a gunman waltzed in and shot anyways. Not to mention the "LGBT menace" kind of shit that right-wingers harp about when china doesn't cut it. What, you're ok with people saying "latinos are all dirty mfers"? I know I'd be incredibly tempted to punch a person if they called me a ch*nk, but maybe you're more 'tolerant' than me. Y'know, in the churchill fashion towards bengalis.
"MLK" you know nothing except the whitewashed shit that passed through the US censors on MLK (well, on many things, but for now let's focus on MLK), and you completely glossing over the BPP makes that glaringly obvious. Black Panther Party. Look it up, read a book on it when you have the time to. Anyways, MLK got shot for his trouble. The BPP was forced down not by the ordinary white supremacists but the ones in the CIA. Next.
"A dose more racist" this_person_has_never_heard_of_US_police_stats.exe
"we're here, we're queer, we're-" oh yeah and when has the blatantly evil shit the KKK said ever elicited such a purge on the KKK? The CIA does worse shit on the regular but calling any of that out makes you 'un-american.' Lmao. We're even granting that this isn't a plant or a false flag, because that's
totally never happened (don't search operation yellowbird, don't look at the CIA/NED involvement in "arab spring," don't think about COINTELPRO or MKUltra)
"they're not africans" true, they got the african in them whipped and lynched out of them until only the skin color, the convenient part for the racists, remained (aside from a few scraps of culture they scavenged from the rubble). As for "Seeding division," the division was always fucking there, and people (especially decently wealthy white people) are
preserving it to the best of their ability.
"they are doing the groomer's job for them" don't look at marriage customs in red states, don't look at marriage customs in red states, don't look don't look don't look. Anyways half the issue of groomers is psychological cope with relentless capitalist exploitation, but nope don't look at that!!!
