You dont think that Gou-san was saying the things he said, and in the way he did, to maybe spur the Yuichi into actually acting like a husband a little bit? I think that Gou-san's commentw (and the way he said them) almost felt like they were trying to be some sort of kick up the ass for Yuu-kun, maybe I'm wrong...So, ch 10+11 pretty much confirm (like ch 7 heavily implied already) that he truly is nothing more than an evil ntr ghost and she always had little invested in her husband + a weak mental constitution and would've cheated full slut style either way, just with someone else.
Good chapter. Really interesting way to cement ghost+wife as the true villains after having him act "human" and seem "worried for her well-being" when the chapter started, just before showing his true colors (once again unfairly shifting and piling ALL the blame on the husband and giga insulting him even tho he knows that she is just as much reason for their failing relationship)
I'm hate reading at this pointI'm sick of itagaki paru.
beastars ended up sucking
the santa one sucks
she made oone other one so forgettable I can't remember
not even going to bother with dis shit
Peace to all of our brothers who bought all the beastars, the santa ones, getting hyped for great excecution with crappy endingsI'm hate reading at this point
I knew nothing besides her Beastsars stuff would be the only thing worth reading so I only got onto this because it was new. I would still reccomend Beastars if people just pretend it ends at the end of the murderer arc.Peace to all of our brothers who bought all the beastars, the santa ones, getting hyped for great excecution with crappy endings
Sad!
The problem is that you think that this is supposed to be a moral parable. That women are not writing complex stories which examine dark topics and uncomfortable situations—noooooo, they must be trying to make an argument to convince you that cheating is okay! And then failing at that thing they were definitely trying to do, because they’re too stupid and immoral!Women can't even take accountability in fiction they write where they could frame it in the best way possible for them. […{ women are kinda evil.
When you write a story you are trying to say something or you are at least passively acknowledging things you affirm/believe. The bias of the author's worldview manifests in the narrative. This is basic pattern recognition when you notice this stuff across every female author in every genre. I don't think it's a moral parable, I think it's a story that reinforces an incorrect morality. You are purposely obtuse and reduce it to just genre which would still equate in bad/subversive writing at minimum.The problem is that you think that this is supposed to be a moral parable. That women are not writing complex stories which examine dark topics and uncomfortable situations—noooooo, they must be trying to make an argument to convince you that cheating is okay! And then failing at that thing they were definitely trying to do, because they’re too stupid and immoral!
Just like Beastars was Paru trying to argue for ethical cannibalism, and Sanda was Paru trying to argue for, uh, changing the juvenile crime laws in Japan and ummmm…….well anyways, women should just write nice stories! If they have icky stuff in them then it’s probably something that the woman secretly wants to do!