Supporter
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2020
- Messages
- 842
The problem with the "middle ground" - who decides its boundaries (some people would consider the very existence of R18 to be unacceptable)? What do you do when boundaries shift (and they always do, back and forth) over time?like, do these people want censorship to happen or not? it's such a shame that the concept of middle-ground has died and now you must take sides else you're everyone's enemy (granted, the concept of "inaction is still action" isn't wrong either, so throw in 2-sideism for good measure, the third "centrist" side doesn't exist says people, only for or against)
Quite a simple example of what is wrong with the "middle ground" - some people consider depiction of homosexuality wrong and as something that should be censored. A lot of people would go "well, obviously we shouldn't lower ourselves to those people's standards".
Other people don't see anything wrong with fictional depiction of things that aren't allowed in reality when it comes to works aimed at mature audience, who should know the difference (\cough\ Japan \cough\), but then then exact same "we shouldn't lower ourselves" people turn around and go "that's absurd - we should censor that", without seeing a shred of irony in that.
Last edited: