My guess is that all mangas have that looming axe over them in this day and age that any sense of world building could lead to low readers so they try to get things going as quick as possible. It creates all these cookie cutter setups taht have at least proven to get people to read to get your story going to some degree. It is crazy how quick places are to drop the axe on interesting stories just because of some drops in readers. I remember reading a manga that was taking its time to set everything in motion and just as it did the axe came down harshly so the story was flipped on its head just to scramble some kind of ending.Killing a hero is not impossible on a purely technical level. You could blackmail him, take a comrade hostage, or exploit some other weakness or 'kryptonite'. Furthermore, killing a hero can be beneficial - eliminating the hero of an enemy country, for example.
The problem is that lazy Japanese authors never think that deeply. They never analyze their simplistic tropes, and they never explore the possibilities. They show no concern for maintaining suspension of disbelief, and they never improve, and I don't know why. Maybe because they never receive much-needed criticism, especially from professional writers. Light novels are called 'light' for a reason, I guess.
Because it is both logical and illogical. He is a hero from another world, and the only reason he is fighting for them is because he wants to. They have no idea if he might one day decide to turn against them. The only reason they were able to deal with him is either because they had something to use against him, or because he accepted it willingly.NO IT'S NOT!
Why do Japanese authors believe it's logical to kill a summoned hero who faithfully fought for you? One fool invented this dumb trope, and the others are blindly copying his homework without even pausing to think if it makes sense or not. I'm so angry!
The hero is basically the ruling class's loyal lapdog and a guardian at this point. He is strengthening their reign by proxy, through the sole fact that he was summoned by them. Roping him in scores them great points; he is also a walking deterrent against their enemies. All a foolish hero who ends up backstabbed in these stories needs to be placated is some mediocre territory and a handsome pension until he dies. The benefits of having him around FAR OUTWEIGH the small chance of him turning against his owners.
On the other hand, killing him would be insanely difficult to justify to the masses. It's also not easy to kill him because, as a hero, he is supposedly OP, and is probably not stupid enough to just obediently die when asked!
Writers need to understand that in the eyes of the ruling class, a placated hero is no bigger threat than a random assassin. As long as he doesn't get all political and power-hungry, there is no point in killing him whatsoever - only numerous dangerous, uncontrollable risks. And not killing him is very profitable. If I were the ruling class, I would placate the hero with women and money and pray he doesn't die for the next 50 years, because that's 50 years of stability and prosperity. If you play your cards well, it could mean expanding your territory and ushering in a golden age.
Same goes for everyone else though? Knights, guards, cooks, maids, etc. - anyone can kill a random king or noble. The reasonable expectation is that the ruling class will not commit mass murder out of paranoia.They have no idea if he might one day decide to turn against them
They don’t control the MC, so he’s a threat.
They weren't murdered, though. It's just the government doing a poor job. Caring about veterans is good optics, and many governments do it as long as the budget is fine. I'm not sure this fits the hero's case.We have veterans thrown to the wayside after giving their lives to serve their countries
They have a compelling reason to eliminate the competition. I'm not sure if this fits the bill, either.kings who poisoned their own children out of fear that they might rise up and overthrow them
mark zuckerberg threw him under the bus
100% agree!Same goes for everyone else though? Knights, guards, cooks, maids, etc. - anyone can kill a random king or noble. The reasonable expectation is that the ruling class will not commit mass murder out of paranoia.
They weren't murdered, though. It's just the government doing a poor job. Caring about veterans is good optics, and many governments do it as long as the budget is fine. I'm not sure this fits the hero's case.
They have a compelling reason to eliminate the competition. I'm not sure if this fits the bill, either.
I still stand by my point. Just as you don't see kings killing their guards, but rather trying to be on their good side, there is no reason to kill a placated hero. A hero is not a burden on the treasury like millions of veterans, nor is he a spent asset that has outlived its usefulness. There are many useful things a hero can do besides killing the demon king. Also, a hero isn't exactly competition for the establishment.
Sure, anything can happen. The king could be incompetent, the kingdom's enemies could conspire to eliminate the hero, or the hero could be a mass murderer who suffers from selective amnesia. I can probably think of thousands of scenarios rationalizing killing the hero off the top of my head. However, doing that is the author's job, not mine. The author never justified the execution. This is just bad writing. As a reader, it's not my job to guess what happened or invent excuses for events that barely started.
Why, though?damn the chapters are gone now
Must've been judged as morally wrong by the people running the site.Why, though?
Nevermind, figured it out. Group got banned for excessive profiteering and other things. Ugh.What the heck happened? Where'd the chapters go?
damnNevermind, figured it out. Group got banned for excessive profiteering and other things. Ugh.
Same goes for everyone else though? Knights, guards, cooks, maids, etc. - anyone can kill a random king or noble. The reasonable expectation is that the ruling class will not commit mass murder out of paranoia.
They weren't murdered, though. It's just the government doing a poor job. Caring about veterans is good optics, and many governments do it as long as the budget is fine. I'm not sure this fits the hero's case.
They have a compelling reason to eliminate the competition. I'm not sure if this fits the bill, either.
I still stand by my point. Just as you don't see kings killing their guards, but rather trying to be on their good side, there is no reason to kill a placated hero. A hero is not a burden on the treasury like millions of veterans, nor is he a spent asset that has outlived its usefulness. There are many useful things a hero can do besides killing the demon king. Also, a hero isn't exactly competition for the establishment.
Sure, anything can happen. The king could be incompetent, the kingdom's enemies could conspire to eliminate the hero, or the hero could be a mass murderer who suffers from selective amnesia. I can probably think of thousands of scenarios rationalizing killing the hero off the top of my head. However, doing that is the author's job, not mine. The author never justified the execution. This is just bad writing. As a reader, it's not my job to guess what happened or invent excuses for events that barely started.
Yeah. Not to mention that the ruling class probably spent a lot on raising the hero. Party selections, monetary support, mobilizing the military, conscription, logistics, buying rare materials, and hiring mercenaries and adventurers - again and again, for many years. The MC probably cost as much as the fucking Manhattan Project by now. Anyone even mentioning assassinating him will be the one assassinated instead.trying to discard a strategic asset is something only a fool would do