You know what... I just don't understand you. I don't get why you seem so offended by my expression of what "I", guy or otherwise find attractive or unattractive in women. Why even engage in the conversation if you're entire point goes something like this: "I don't like the fact that you expressed your views".
And I'm gonna double, triple, quadruple down on the fact that YES - I CANNOT UNDERSTAND why a skeletal, stick-figure, obviously unhealthy, and quite obviously unhappy (hint: starvation isn't fun), depiction of a woman's body can be attractive to anyone at all, anywhere in the world, while at the same time acknowledging that yes it's possible, even though I disapprove of it, and you obviously do too since you said so quite clearly.
And I still believe that the ideal body type that the author in this manga is trying to depict has gone waaay too far even for what may be a reference to East Asian beauty standards, to the point of obvious absurdity - the FL is so obviously frail and physically prone that she falls down walking in a straight line on a paved path in the very first chapter - but you seem so much more offended that I expressed my opinion - any opinion for that matter since no amount of caveats or context can satisfy your apparent distaste of what you believe to be a man talking about what 'he' finds attractive or unattractive about women. At this point, I'm left wondering why you even care about my individual tastes?
Why should *all* standards of beauty be discarded? Are you implying that since you think I'm male, I shouldn't have any right to express what I find physically attractive or unattractive in women? Can't we have healthy aspirations towards certain body types regardless of sex or gender? And what's with your weird logic? So, you can tell women not to starve themselves to achieve a certain look, but I can't? Aren't you asserting your own beauty standards while refusing to engage in a conversation on that very same topic?
You do realize that you're indirectly defending the ideal body type of physical emaciation by refusing to have standards (or even express them) while at the same time saying you agree that women shouldn't starve themselves? How does that square with you? Are you seriously mad about the fact that I have standards at all or that beauty standards exist? Does it feel like this rando guy on the internet has God-forbid, imposed *his* standards on you?
I honestly tried to be tactful and respectful, but you've just totally glossed over the real life examples I gave of pale or thin women actually being attractive from my perspective (maybe you didn't read that part?) but nothing seems to matter when you have preconceived notions about who and what I am. It's okay tho. I thought I'd get a well-reasoned retort or a different perspective since you wrote so much, but I've given up hope on actually having a conversation on beauty standards (and whether we should have them at all). This is really about what you think this 'internet guy' likes and 'him' forcing his likes on you, right? I'm the sleazy bad 'guy' right?
Oh, and if you're gonna reply, stop saying that I'm offended because my 'preferences' weren't acknowledged. I've already told you that I'm offended by the starvation/emaciation/skeletal etc, ideal type of body. I think a lot of people would be triggered by the same thing.
Besides the phrase 'natural curves' which means: whatever natural figure a woman has, I didn't express any specific standard of beauty or advocate for a particular standard, you merely inserted the instagram babe idea on your own and then conflated my being against the FL lead's unhealthy body type with your own imagined notion of what my personal standards are.
You know if you wanted me to shut up, why not just say so? Why pretend like this is a convo? Just go ahead and insert your views down my throat while complaining about how I've inserted my views down your throat. Stop pretending like you care about the plight of women everywhere forced to adhere to unrealistic beauty standards and just say that you can't stand the idea of some random 'guy' on the internet expressing 'his' views in a way you don't like. Wouldn't that be so much easier then all the pretense you've been throwing around?