Well where else did you think pixie dust came from?Are we just going to ignore that they are grinding up the black fairies and using the dust like some sort of messed up Peter Pan?
I assumed from the pixie dealer that was at the second star on the left.Well where else did you think pixie dust came from?
And in front of him, too… he could catch on to what's happening, decide that he doesn't like his feelings being dictated by a random flowerbed and destroy it or somethingI find the open discussion of the game between the heroine and the MC rather jarring.
Exept that MC said that one of the reason that the prince still had affection for her was because of the gift she gave him.I come by here and notice that everyone is missing the point this chapter tried to make.
The flowerbed doesn't seem to do shit anymore.
Or, at least, the one that gets affection from whoever's color the freesias are is no longer Alicia, it's Ophelia.
Did she say that? Because I distinctly remember commenting on how she was questioning if that was a thing or not.Exept that MC said that one of the reason that the prince still had affection for her was because of the gift she gave him.
Because if the flowerbed work then other game mechanics must still exist, so if she give someone something that would rise their affection in the game it would also do it here.
So the main reason he can "resist" the flower is most probably because she raised his affection in other way.
Even better plot point imo is anyone messing with the flower bed would break it/null effect or the last state of the flowerbed (all black flowers) is hard locked now. AKA she bugged/glitched it, again, because she's stupid.Did she say that? Because I distinctly remember commenting on how she was questioning if that was a thing or not.
And, in that comment, I promptly made fun of her because "giving people gifts improves their impression of you??? Who would have thunk it!?"
She didn't confirm jack squat other than the effects of the flowerbed. And even then, that shit is jank. It only went into effect when one of the two ladies looked at it. And it's such a stupid plot device in the first place. It's suppposed to be an indicator, not a modifier.
If someone other than the gardener messed with it forcefully, a smarter plot point would be it would just go back to default settings and start over.
Instead, we got this.
The entire world have the same rule as the game, why would gift that raise affection not work when we were show multiple time that the color of the flower in the flowerbed affect the men's.Did she say that? Because I distinctly remember commenting on how she was questioning if that was a thing or not.
And, in that comment, I promptly made fun of her because "giving people gifts improves their impression of you??? Who would have thunk it!?"
She didn't confirm jack squat other than the effects of the flowerbed. And even then, that shit is jank. It only went into effect when one of the two ladies looked at it. And it's such a stupid plot device in the first place. It's suppposed to be an indicator, not a modifier.
If someone other than the gardener messed with it forcefully, a smarter plot point would be it would just go back to default settings and start over.
Instead, we got this.
This is an assumption. "Assumption makes an ass of you and me."The entire world have the same rule as the game, why would gift that raise affection not work when we were show multiple time that the color of the flower in the flowerbed affect the men's.
Which means the "heroine" looked at the flowerbed. Which is to say, "one of the two ladies" as I outlined in my previous comment.The color of the flower affect the dude even when no one look at them. It was show the two time the "heroine" changed the flower,