Daily/Weekly Chapter Rankings [Planned]

[00two]

Daily/Weekly Chapter Rankings was such a useful feature for finding new and trending manga. It was also what kept me constantly coming back everyday and I'd love for it to be implemented again, perhaps on the homepage or by sorting through advanced search.

 

[BraveDude8]

Reliant on public views, blocked until that's sorted.

 

[Remocracy]

Reliant on public views, blocked until that's sorted.

I remember someone saying they already had the view data

 

[BraveDude8]

I remember someone saying they already had the view data

public views.

 

[Remocracy]

public views.

What's the difference?

 

[BraveDude8]

What's the difference?

it being visible publicly on the site

 

[Remocracy]

it being visible publicly on the site

oh, that's what you meant.

 

[thubs]

I really miss this feature, hope this gets figured out asap!

 

[critico]

After 10 months it seems to me that the functionality of the new site is completely on par with the old version, with the exception of this issue and the embedded comments.
Are any update on this topic available?
This feature helped me in the past to discover countless gem, while the popular new titles feature is totally useless for my personal tastes.

 

[Daflon]

Just the top most read manga of the week or day

mod note: merged into thread

 

[BzzBzz]

Considering serialization schedule of most series and irregularity of translation I don't see any reason for anything smaller than "manga of the month".

mod note: merged into thread

 

[JamesBunny]

I know homepage is already cuttlered, but this is different from “top new manga” because it will be random. Yes, there’s already a random manga feature but this will be something for everyone to at least consider reading and talk about.


pros:
little known works get brought into the spotlight
dropped works long forgotten might get seen by a potential translator
people can discover works they might not of otherwise found (yes it’s redundant with random manga feature)

cons:
more clutter on homepage
likely to be more meaningful for one shots or short ones, while not so much for longer works.
random manga feature exists

mod note: merged into existing thread

 

[ArimaKiyofumi]

I know that view counts are still not back, but still hopeful for this section to return since many of the mangas that I follow are from this suggestion.

Being able to see it again is helpful since majority of the long running mangas from the past 5 years or so ended, so finding new ones is something to look forward to.

mod note: merged into thread

 

[Teasday]

Yeah the idea is to bring back those categories when we have the data (views) that enable us to do so.

mod note: merged into thread

 

[kydfp]

Hi MangaDex,

I’d like to suggest adding a ranking board to the website that analyzes manga popularity based on traffic, views, comments, bookmarks, etc. It could also be categorized into different time frames—weekly, monthly, and all-time rankings. Additionally, it might be useful to have subcategories based on country or language.

This feature would help readers quickly see which mangas are trending, making it easier to discover something interesting to read without spending too much time searching.

Thank you for considering this suggestion!

mod note: merged into existing thread

 

[J4mag]

Theres currently no good way to discover series on Mangadex.

Your options are essentially:

• staff picks
• live feed of chapter releases
• advanced search with a sufficiently narrow set of search terms

None of these options are great. Staff picks are maybe obviously the tastes of a few people, and oftentimes series with one or two chapters. The live feed of chapter releases is frankly useless, and it heavily skews towards weekly releases rather than monthlies. And advanced search skews towards old series, and just lacks the entropy to discover things.

I'd like a system where activity on a series (follows, views, reviews) is stored with some recency information, allowing a "popular" list which only includes activity in the last X days. A more sophisticated view of the activity could filter for "rising" series whose activity has increased disproportionately recently.

This could be implemented by keeping a rolling queue of daily activity, which upon getting pushed out of the queue is added to a longer-term queue of weekly or monthly activity.

See royalroad as a platform with some great approaches at series discovery.

Alternative options:

• public lists by curators
• a search option to filter by "new" series below a certain upload date, to pair with "popular" or "best rated". Ideally faster than that, though.
• open to other thoughts.

mod note: merged into thread

 

[J4mag]

I should add that the scrolling bar of 10 "Popular New Titles" is much too short a list for discovery purposes, and thus lacks genre variety.

And also that filtering publication year in advanced search is both too coarse a time window, too indirect a metric on recency, and takes something like 10 clicks to get to from the home page, which makes it have too much friction to be useful for browsing.

mod note: merged into thread

 

[BzzBzz]

Your options are essentially:
* staff picks

Alternative options:
* public lists by curators

What's the differnce? I see none.
You criticize the first one but then suggest literally the same option?

mod note: merged into thread

 

[deleted-user-091f6c2e94]

You know, your public lists by curators suggestion is already implemented isn't it? MDLists can be publicly shared afaik.

As for popularity metrics/sorting I assume it's probably really costly database wise to provide this info due to a few technical details on how MD is implemented, and how MD's team try to keep server loads as low as possible.
Like we don't even have the views counter per chapter for a long while now. Along with other features from MD v3 that still do not have a single prospect of ever returning, like filtering the homepage with tags for example

mod note: merged into thread

 

[J4mag]

What's the differnce? I see none.
You criticize the first one but then suggest literally the same option?

The main issue is the staff recommendations are a small set of series. It's basically a single list, which rotates occasionally, but that's it.

Community lists can be much longer, can be focused on certain genres or ideas, etc. They exist right now, as Trodsen helpfully points out:

You know, your public lists by curators suggestion is already implemented isn't it? MDLists can be publicly shared afaik.

... But they can't be shared or discovered except externally. MVP would be a public "list of Lists" somewhere on the site, but preferably it would be sorted by follows on that list.

Lists are pretty much half-implemented. At some point, they might as well not exist because if you need an external tool to find them, you might as well put the list on that external tool, too. Why share a List when you could share a list of links, unless the List can be found from within the website?

mod note: merged into thread