@Kierlak No it..... it isn't nebulous at all. Hate speech is a clearly defined thing. Did you maybe not know that? It even has a Wikipedia page, for example. There have been lawsuits over hate speech and whether or not it is legal; countries around the world have varying legislation regarding the circumstantial legality of hate speech. Do you think those people are making it up as they go??
A good example of how to think about it is very similar to the categorization of some words as "swears" or "cusses;" everybody has varying ideas as to what crosses the line into that category, but if you're in some circumstance where you are not allowed to swear, then you shouldn't say
any of the words you think come close to crossing that line. Your definition of what qualifies is not as important as the definition held by the person in this hypothetical circumstance who is banning you from swearing.
I will admit, however, that I agree the "Gay thread" or however it has become referred to in this thread was a mistake.
But, if the
only example of "moderators abusing the guidelines" that has been cited so far is an instance where one was trying to interpret intended tone or meaning in a
literally one-word post, I can understand there having been some mistakes made. Also, it was likely a result of over-zealousness in the wake of the newly-implemented report system, and not proof of a trend that will definitely develop and remain.
I agree that abuse of power is a troubling thing, but I'm not right there alongside everyone else who seems to agree there's already undeniable proof it will definitely occur. There isn't.
@ninjadork I have been reading the thread from the beginning, which is why I wrote my post as I did. But having reread some of the posts as per your recommendation, I only have this to repeat:
if your immediate reaction to this isn't "oh good hopefully there's gonna be less assholes in the comment section" you might be the reason we now have a report button