Agree, I think the ex wasn’t a bad guy, he stated that he wanted sex and was honest, and most likely she didn’t give enough, knew that they aren’t compatibleThe ex was honest and then jump her, respect on the guy.
Author wanted to depict him as a bit of abad guy, but if you ar ein a serious relationship with someone having sex is natural, and from the dialogue is clear they were together for a while, not being given the green light is a sign of the other side not giving trust or not being compatible, he did the right thing to axe the relationship, rough? yes, but correct.
To argue the first point, those aren't even the same sentences. What the author wrote through the ex was frustration, lack of patience, understanding, etc. What you wrote was literally fuckbuddy dialogue. We know this is because ex did not simply say "but you won't let me hit that". We had a whole page of additional dialogue, that you conveniently omit just just to say "well I see you mostly for sex". Sex is immutably an important part of virtually any adult relationship. They way he brought it up was certainly crude, but he had his reasons and they weren't unfounded either. He obviously was not that bad to her, because the worst of scum would've simply resorted to 'other means', but we're only three chapters in so who knows. We might see him again under different circumstances, judge him then.it's not that he dumped her, it's how he dumped her.
- "but you won't let me hit that".... Imma giive this some leeway for the translation here but you really wanna open up a separation with "well I see you mostly for sex"
- "whenever we get a good mood going"... if she's distracting from sex it was clearly not a good mood.
- "You're bland and I'm tired of it, tired of you"... So you never took the time to get to know her, her hobbies, or aspirations. And it sounds like you never opened up about YOUR hobbies/aspirations either. Just talk about how you keep getting denied sex.
I guess there's minimal respect for respecting her boundaries and cutting it off, but this felt like a very selfish relationship. And unfortunately Sensei seems to have internalized that feedback. Not entierly his fault, but it shows you need to be careful with your words.
"You're beautiful, but I don't think we're compatible in bed and I feel I never truly got to know the real you. Let's see other people". Boom. Same words, very different delivery.
The only thing I'm worried about is if this is publicized, it's going to drag out instead of being a nice tight run.that was quick. is the raw far along or did Author really speedrun a publication from 3 chapters?
What I'm trying to figure out is why are people trying to assign blame? Sure, he's a crude asshole who probably only wanted to smash, but she also just didn't feel the same way. In fact she knows she's bad a relationships, and understands why she isn't in one.To argue the first point, those aren't even the same sentences. What the author wrote through the ex was frustration, lack of patience, understanding, etc. What you wrote was literally fuckbuddy dialogue. We know this is because ex did not simply say "but you won't let me hit that". We had a whole page of additional dialogue, that you conveniently omit just just to say "well I see you mostly for sex". Sex is immutably an important part of virtually any adult relationship. They way he brought it up was certainly crude, but he had his reasons and they weren't unfounded either. He obviously was not that bad to her, because the worst of scum would've simply resorted to 'other means', but we're only three chapters in so who knows. We might see him again under different circumstances, judge him then.
Lastly, they dated: she had all the time in the world to get the chickens in a row, and blew it. Literally by her own admission. The ex is not entirely without fault, buy neither was she. Everyone is different and the act of dating is literally there to do resolve just that, its not just "oh hey lets just get some snacks". If you think that he didn't give respect, well then pot-meet-kettle. "I ain't a little kid", because that's what it looks like from the outside looking in.
Imagine if the teacher’s ex is MC’s uncle, would be peak awkwardWhat I'm trying to figure out is why are people trying to assign blame? Sure, he's a crude asshole who probably only wanted to smash, but she also just didn't feel the same way. In fact she knows she's bad a relationships, and understands why she isn't in one.
Both were honest in their own way, and that led to where she is now. Getting Rizzed by someone who studied at the Hugh Jackman's School for Gifted Cougar Catchers.
To argue the first point, those aren't even the same sentences. What the author wrote through the ex was frustration, lack of patience, understanding, etc. What you wrote was literally fuckbuddy dialogue.
". Sex is immutably an important part of virtually any adult relationship. They way he brought it up was certainly crude, but he had his reasons and they weren't unfounded either. He obviously was not that bad to her, because the worst of scum would've simply resorted to 'other means',
Lastly, they dated: she had all the time in the world to get the chickens in a row, and blew it. Literally by her own admission. The ex is not entirely without fault, buy neither was she.
Everyone is different and the act of dating is literally there to do resolve just that, its not just "oh hey lets just get some snacks". If you think that he didn't give respect, well then pot-meet-kettle. "I ain't a little kid", because that's what it looks like from the outside looking in.
What I'm trying to figure out is why are people trying to assign blame? Sure, he's a crude asshole who probably only wanted to smash, but she also just didn't feel the same way. In fact she knows she's bad a relationships, and understands why she isn't in one.