if there's even a trace of ambiguity, I'm going to treat it in my favor".
The trace of ambiguity I was talking about was:
A) Yuu doesn't say who paid for the tickets in any translation
B) Yuu says Aya wanted to go to this movie
B) two translations indicate Aya paid and one indicates Yuu paid
therefore, it's reasonable for me to state that it's not conclusive that Yuu planned & paid for this date. Like I'm not even saying you're wrong, just that the text isn't so clear cut as to definitively prove that I'm wrong.
Which my argument here was that 3 translations line up w.r.t. to conveying a subjunctive mood and I'm not gonna argue on translator choice unless I think there's some sort of consensus. I'm gonna explain why I think the manga translation is in the subjunctive, but I also acknowledge that the very nature of the explanation is why you could read it as not being in the subjunctive.
I think the way "I'd" and "would" is used here indicates the hypothetical since it's paired w/ the condition "as long as you". I think if the translations were trying to convey that this was a description of the present state of their relationship, then it would be more appropriate to use "will":
- "as long as you invite me, there's now way I'll turn down an invitation"
- "as long as you're the one asking, I'll go anywhere"
https://www.thesaurus.com/articles/will-vs-would
ETA: also if it's not in the subjunctive & Yuu is doing the inviting in this chapter than Aya's actions here are contradicting Aya's thoughts there - here Aya retreats to "let's go to hotel/physical intimacy" rather than doing the action she's stating she'll do of embracing the activity that Yuu is inviting her to do. Which yeah sure I've argued that Aya's a self-contradictory mess, but somehow I don't think that's what you're intending to argue. If anything, I think this chapter supports why Yuu thinks Aya doesn't like dates, but that's what Aya is explicitly contradicting by saying "if you invite me".
If their "normal" date doesn't include that specific cliche, it doesn't count?
Not to Aya if this is what she's fixating on when mourning the relationship, rather than the kisses/cuddles/sex. It was a choice for Maruto/Yom to highlight an image of something they're never shown doing.
What kind of argument would convince you that she's not doing that "insecure thinking" thing?
Um definitely not 26.6, where you're gonna argue the opposite, so let's just short circuit that now: Basically she's asking herself "why does Yuu go along w/ this older girls whims?"/"why is he trying so hard to make me happy"
I'm gonna say that secure girls don't think like this (Hikari never questions why Yuu is nice to her), you're probably gonna say that she's just being appreciative. I'm gonna say that Aya flagging the "older girl" is her thinking he's nice to the persona, you're probably gonna reply "she is an older girl", back and forth we go.
Like I honestly just think this is intractable b/c we're reading this from such distinctly different perspectives. ETA: legit, I think Maruto plays with this with Yuu being blindsided by the break up while Aya'a friend predicted it.
which is almost the opposite of a young guy being in relationship just for sex.
So I should have been clearer here - I don't mean he's w/ her for sex in a "basically sex worker" way, but in a "this is an FWB/situationship" way. That he's w/ her cause she's convenient, not cause he's in love w/ her.
So I think yes, there is an indication that Yuu thinks she wants more than she expresses.
But not that she's joking. To keep going to "bind w/ body", Aya is aiming for "convenient" morphing into "connected". I'm just claiming that Yuu did a poor job of communicating back to Aya that her strategy worked.
Look here: he doesn't push back on Aya's final statement, which prompts Aya to ask to exchange IDs, which in a previous chapter Aya thought Yuu not asking for her ID was a sign of disinterest. She's the one here making the move to seal the deal (again).