Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2026
- Messages
- 29
I understand Shinya78’s point, and I agree that drama is good for shounen rom-coms too. It creates tension and gives viewers a reason to keep following the story.I mean, i agree with you the fact that the author really likes playing with uncertainty and misunderstandings is an objective point, there isn't much to debate there. My point is more that, if that actually happened, it would be a plot hole impossible to justify, and Higurashi explained it perfectly here:
In a shonen rom-com, even if there’s some drama, it's impossible to justify the "I like Nao, but since I don't want to lose him because of the lust, I'm going to suck someone else's dick and fuck him in a hotel" logic (and I’m spelling it out in detail so you can see just how stupid that argument is). I mean, the premise itself is a logical contradiction: if you were very sad when Nao caught you kissing another guy, and he avoided you for days because of it, what do you think will happen if he catches you having sex with someone else?
As I said, that reduces Luna to someone who acts based on assumptions she’s cooked up entirely in her own head:
"If I tell Nao how I feel, I MIGHT lose him."
"If I tell Nao I want to have sex with him, I MIGHT lose him."
How do you know? Have you asked him? In fact, you know perfectly well what Nao feels for you, or, at least, you have a good idea about it.
That’s why I say she fits the classic trope of the brainless heroine who acts based on assumptions and fears instead of using her head. Obviously, that’s distinct from NTR doujins, those are a completely different story.
But if she actually did sleep with some random guy, I honestly can’t see and probably never will understand why this specific kind of drama is good or necessary for the story. I get that the author probably wanted to push the MC into confessing to the FMC, so they needed some kind of catalyst, but there are so many other ways to do that lol.
And again, I still think this is probably just bait from the author. Like Shinya78 said, the author’s wording never explicitly confirms that anything actually happened. It seems deliberately written to make us think it happened and jump to that conclusion, rather than actually stating it outright.
Basically, I have no problem with the author using ambiguity and misunderstandings to create tension. My issue is specifically with the idea that the most extreme interpretation actually happened, because I don’t think that would make much sense for either the story or the characters.