Fed-Kun's army
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 1,402
NEXT
CHIHARU vs INTERVIEW
CHIHARU vs INTERVIEW
Not piracy as it involves the purchase of a physical book and can share that physical copy as you please.By your definition reading from a friend that bought the manga is piracy then, as it's your friend who bought it, not you.
Storing? No. Distributing? Yes.Taking a photo and storing it is piracy?
In this specific example you paid for the physical book and thus own your physical copy of the book, not the story written in the book. The entire library system relies on this not violating copyright and thus not being piracy.What if you disponibilize your collection for free to read in your job. You paid for your copy and you're free to do whatever you want with it, no?
If not authorized by the author. Yes, it is literally impossible for a translation to be an original work, or it wouldn't be translation.Is translating it piracy?
Not only sharing art.Or only sharing the art?
It is piracy.So reading LN from scans isn't piracy as the text you're reading is someone else's translation work?
Irrelevant for whether something is or isn't piracy.The problem is that they're reading your product for free or that the money you invested isn't giving return because they're reading it for free?
I can't tell if you meant to type a statement or a question, it reads like both. If your question was actually "What money was invested in the western market to argue losses in said market due to piracy?" Again, that is irrelevant for whether or not it is considered piracy.If is the latter, which money you invested specifically in the western market to argue losses in said market due to piracy.
First, no one in in this thread is the original creator, so why are you writing your statements as the original creator needing to explain their reasoning? Second, "why?"? There's a thousand reasons "why" someone could do something. Be more specific with your question. Do notice though that this statement admits that piracy is occurring just that the author shouldn't care because sales are occurring because of piracy.If you're not obligated to invest in western market, why bother with piracy there even tho your sales in western market are solely due to piracy, as no advertisement was made there?
That doesn't change whether or not the act is considered piracy. It only argues that certain acts of piracy are beneficial for the original creator. It's this logic that allows the doujin business to thrive in Japan even though it is blatant copyright infringement. That doesn't stop it from being illegal, it only makes it beneficial.You're earning money and reputation w/o any extra investment aside from the one done locally in your country.
Again, why are you asking him as if he is the original creator? Are you instead asking possible reasons why the original creator would want to? The original creator's reasoning can be "I don't want people reading my work outside of official channels, fuck the money." and you could chew a big fat turd because it doesn't matter if it hurts him, it's his right as the copyright owner to say "fuck you".You're not the one earning money with sales outside your country? Why do you care if you don't bothered with the market there?
Theft will always occur. Murder can not be stopped either. The lack of ability to stop the process has no bearing on it's legality or moral consequences. It is blatantly piracy. Whether or not piracy is a bad thing in all cases is a fundamentally separate question.Making it stop isn't an opition, never has been, because what you call piracy, in essence, with this product, isn't.
Even if someone were to agree that entertainment was a necessity, that doesn't mean you have the right to entertain yourself with whoever's work you want without condition. Just like food is a necessity but you are not legally allowed to take it from whoever you want.Also entertainment is a necessity, it's one of the things involved in keeping your mental health, which is equally important as your physical health.
No it won't, why? because I would be lent the book, or the account to read said manga, but if what I'm lent is a reproduction/duplication outside what said friend bought, then yes it would be piracy in said case.By your definition reading from a friend that bought the manga is piracy then, as it's your friend who bought it, not you.
if said photo is used outside of "fair usage" yes. If you pay attention almost all media comes with something that starts with "Any partial or total reproduction or representation for other purposes on any medium whatsoever is prohibited without prior and express authorization from..."Taking a photo and storing it is piracy?
yes is piracy.What if you photograph your copy and send it to your group of friends so you don't need to lend your physical copy?
You are lending the copies you bought. Different from duplicating and lending those duplicated copies.What if you disponibilize your collection for free to read in your job. You paid for your copy and you're free to do whatever you want with it, no?
if you don't share the translation, no. when you share it, yes.Is translating it piracy? Or only sharing the art?
it is piracy. You would be reading an unauthorized/illegal reproduction of a copyrighted work.So reading LN from scans isn't piracy as the text you're reading is someone else's translation work?
Irrelevant, even if posted for non-profit, it is still the property of someone else, and unless that person says that is ok to go and release copies/translations, releasing it would be stealing the rights of property of the author.The problem is that they're reading your product for free or that the money you invested isn't giving return because they're reading it for free?
Irrelevant, it can be piracy even if is a non-profit publication.If is the latter, which money you invested specifically in the western market to argue losses in said market due to piracy?
So it is ok that someone comes to your house and takes away without your permission something you aren't using?If you're not obligated to invest in western market, why bother with piracy there even tho your sales in western market are solely due to piracy, as no advertisement was made there?
Irrelevant, what would make author earn money would be the legally bought (books, manga, etc)You're earning money and reputation w/o any extra investment aside from the one done locally in your country.
Property rights, is to the one that creates something to decide what to do with that something.You're not the one earning money with sales outside your country? Why do you care if you don't bothered with the market there?
Maybe it is about money, but still, is the decision of the one that created it, or owns the rights, to decide how/who/when etc. something is used/distributed. Which take the discussion back to piracy.The discussion is far more than is it piracy or not
It's money, has always been.
depends on the author or license holder, but still doesn't change that it is piracy if anyone that doesn't have the authorization to do it, release copies and/or translations of other intellectual property.You can work with that to earn your rightful money or leave things as is.
It is an option, or didn't you saw entire titles being taken down here in this site, or entire websites being closed down? stop deluding yourself, it is piracy.Making it stop isn't an opition, never has been, because what you call piracy, in essence, with this product, isn't.
And you can find lots of things to entertain yourself that are free. But reading/watching something that someone has uploaded without having the rights or permission to do is piracy.Also entertainment is a necessity, it's one of the things involved in keeping your mental health, which is equally important as your physical health.
It's not a right, so just piracy it, read it, shut it up, and buy when you can (and to the original publisher whenever you can) but remember if you didn't buy it is piracy, don't pass it as another thing.
If you're not obligated to invest in western market, why bother with piracy there even tho your sales in western market are solely due to piracy, as no advertisement was made there?
The discussion is far more than is it piracy or not
It's money, has always been.