He tried asking, and then simply defended himself knocking him out without dealing much damage (or dealt no damage at all). Even after knocking him out, he didn't "enslave" him. Don't you see the difference in those two approaches? The other tamers don't care about other party's will at all.Hypocrite for doing what is essentially the same as animal abuse to what he said.
No, no, he beat him up first and then gave him food. So... wait, that's still monster abuse.So fighting a monster in equal ground to make them your summon is abuse...giving your summon an addictive type food so they say yes to being your summon is ethical....the second he gets a female human type monster I'm out.
He tried asking, and then simply defended himself knocking him out without dealing much damage (or dealt no damage at all). Even after knocking him out, he didn't "enslave" him. Don't you see the difference in those two approaches? The other tamers don't care about other party's will at all.
The second he give addictive drug to his partner that make it "push asside its instinct", it's immoral. Even if he's giving it the snack after they are already contracted. The beast chips as it is described is a dangerous item that should absolutely not be used unless for special case like placation, morphine, counter measure to brainwash/status effect....He tried asking, and then simply defended himself knocking him out without dealing much damage (or dealt no damage at all). Even after knocking him out, he didn't "enslave" him. Don't you see the difference in those two approaches? The other tamers don't care about other party's will at all.