Ah, yes, I see, women are better than men at politics and power plays, which is why historically every major civilization was ruled by women and men only took over in desperate times that generally preceded periods of severe decline with only a handful of exceptions. Makes perfect sense, that totally lines up with history.I'm no feminist, but this reasoning they have for weakening the nobles is incredibly sexist and rather offensive. It basically hinges on women being less capable at politics and power plays than men (which is flat out wrong) and how this would cause the power of the noble class to diminish. Maybe in wartime, yes, as it is still the men who fight in wars and hold the military power. But in peacetime, this makes zero sense.
...or I'm totally misunderstanding something, because sadly the chapter's explanation was incredibly badly phrased and I could only gather the above from the comments here.
Thanks for sharing. And also Holy Misogyny From The Author, Batman!For people, like me, who are confused about the explanation then here is what a nice redditor surmised it as.
Thanks u/Tecotaco636 for the explanation & thanks for the translations.
It is not too dissimilar from the system put in place by Ieyasu Tokugawa with the establishment of his Shogunate. He had usurped power from the Toyotomi Clan and he knew it. He also didn't want it happening to him. All the daimyos had to maintain a household in Edo and were required to spend every other year there as part of this system he had designed called sankin-kōtai. Nominally, it was to ensure good communications and relations between all parts of the realm, from the capital to the outer reaches. It also had a side effect of them spending large amounts of their tax wealth in the capital, thereby enriching the capital at the expense of the provinces without the need of a direct tax.Dunno why but this might be inspired from real life
More proof that all stupidity and nonsense in this chapter is the author himself's sole responsibilityLike many others, I also found the chapter very confusing so I went to read the LN. Here is the LN chapter:
Thanks for the chapter!
What you're missing, is that men still hold a monopoly on force. Female warriors are very rare in the setting (the Tough for Us alternate story has them show up to guard a villain).I'm no feminist, but this reasoning they have for weakening the nobles is incredibly sexist and rather offensive. It basically hinges on women being less capable at politics and power plays than men (which is flat out wrong) and how this would cause the power of the noble class to diminish. Maybe in wartime, yes, as it is still the men who fight in wars and hold the military power. But in peacetime, this makes zero sense.
...or I'm totally misunderstanding something, because sadly the chapter's explanation was incredibly badly phrased and I could only gather the above from the comments here.
Well, as the Queen mentioned, after a long period of war there was a shortage of male noble heirs (high fatality rate).But as @equationx also mentions above, this "brainwashing" plan did not require any shift in power between the sexes. They could have "reeducated" the male heirs just as easily at the academy, and thus have the nobility spiral into decadence.
Yes you skip the exactly that, mylene explain that bcz of flying stone and flying island make the war cheaper and more rewarding, hence warlords (emphasize the "war") have a lot of power and resources and some try to fuck with the kingdom.Maybe in wartime
First of all, i would say that the translation wasn't accurate in some parts of the chapter, and also that the whole reasoning behind was compressed to not make much sense.I'm no feminist, but this reasoning they have for weakening the nobles is incredibly sexist and rather offensive. It basically hinges on women being less capable at politics and power plays than men (which is flat out wrong) and how this would cause the power of the noble class to diminish. Maybe in wartime, yes, as it is still the men who fight in wars and hold the military power. But in peacetime, this makes zero sense.
...or I'm totally misunderstanding something, because sadly the chapter's explanation was incredibly badly phrased and I could only gather the above from the comments here.
Yeah the planning wasn't done right, but it's not like everyone can accurately predict what a new idea would cause in the future.This honestly seems quite retarded. Sorry but I feel the author fumbled this one.
I won't comment on the whole male/female superiority or whatever. There's a lot of posts already and I don't want to enter that. I don't believe in any superiority anyway.
But: "let's make our ruling class completely incompetent so that we can substitute them!" is very retarded.
Because so many things can go wrong, and of course people that are in decline and worry about losing power would end up trying to rebel or defect or create all sort of problems.
And in fact NOBODY helped during this crisis, and the kingdom is STILL a complete mess of horrible nobles
You could have tried to better educate the nobles and that would have been better. Worst case scenario, you still get rebellions and problems. Bets case scenario, you get less problems.
there are a lot more women who've ruined entire political structures than brought prosperity to them, for every Irene of Byzantium, Jadwiga of Poland, or Agnes of Dunbar... there are 40 other females who caused massive instability and chaos that left the realm stagnant and in shambles (looking at virtually every roman empress and early byzantine empresses who ruined everything by trying to turn their sons into tools for them and their lovers...the entire eastern concubines of china ect)I'm no feminist, but this reasoning they have for weakening the nobles is incredibly sexist and rather offensive. It basically hinges on women being less capable at politics and power plays than men (which is flat out wrong) and how this would cause the power of the noble class to diminish. Maybe in wartime, yes, as it is still the men who fight in wars and hold the military power. But in peacetime, this makes zero sense.
...or I'm totally misunderstanding something, because sadly the chapter's explanation was incredibly badly phrased and I could only gather the above from the comments here.
they in fact live in a societytldr: they empowered women into being degenerates to have men constantly competing internally among themselves and wasting all their money trying to simp for a potential wife who has 20 male slaves to fit her sexual desires thus killing off the hereditary nobles as a class, only to have it backfire into a female centered political structure where only the upper political families still had male centered power and all other classes became female supremacist and made men a second class citizen, but since this didn't hurt the kingdom's royal family it was left intact
totally cant happen in re-onlyfans ....