The issue is that The guard has a time setting where they actually have to go home etc because guarding is just a job meanwhile the slave can stay with the MC 24/7Where do these authors get the idea that slavery could be cheaper in the long run. If you already live in a populated area, finding hired help for a reasonable price should be trivial. Owning a whole person takes a large lump sum upfront plus upkeep for having them live on your property.
She could hire someone else for the night shift.The guard has a time setting where they actually have to go home
Hmm, I guess it is very convenient that slaves don't need any sleep, huh.the slave can stay with the MC 24/7
That is a major reason in many isekai indeed, but since this wasn't mentioned here I'm ignoring it. And she had a history of hiring people from a reputable establishment (the guild) and none betrayed her.The other thing is that a Guard I imagine could betray you Unlike a slave where usually there's some magical rule bs that prevents them from hurting you
Yeah, I'm paranoid about meadows and thickets unless I'm completely bundled up and then check every inch of skin for ticks at home.I'm surprised that the Authors never insert an issue with these places like a fuck load of ticks or mosquitoes
Ah yes, ethical slavery, the best kind that causes no moral issues.
Where do these authors get the idea that slavery could be cheaper in the long run. If you already live in a populated area, finding hired help for a reasonable price should be trivial. Owning a whole person takes a large lump sum upfront plus upkeep for having them live on your property.
She is a Japanese isekai protagonist. At most she would want to restrain an assailant, but would much prefer to just scare them away. One of those stones would would do neither of those things, and just outright kill someone it was thrown at.The only thing I kept thinking was: SHE HURT A DRAGON! A DRAGON! Make another one of those stones and just throw it at the assailant, they are bound to go poof.
Nah. In populated areas like towns and villages it's cheaper, less troublesome, and more flexible to use local labor. You can hire as many as you need each day, cut their pay if they screw up, and easily find replacements if they get sick or die.Because even if you properly feed, house, and cloth a person, it is way cheaper then then paying a regular wage even with an upfront cost of purchase.
That honestly depends on many factors, not all of which would readily apparent to someone of a different culture. Especially so when you consider the type of employee she would be hiring. Not arguing that an appropriate slave would be any easier to aquire, only that the process of hiring and vetting a bodyguard would cost just as much as finding and purchasing a slave would be.Nah. In populated areas like towns and villages it's cheaper, less troublesome, and more flexible to use local labor.
No not really. Unless your hiring unskilled labor, you're going to want to do a much more thorough background check on anyone you're going to be hiring. Especially so if you need someone to deal with money or security. And if you can fire a screwup, why wouldn't you be able to sell/trade one back to the slave merchant?You can hire as many as you need each day, cut their pay if they screw up, and easily find replacements if they get sick or die.
Useful yes, but not exclusively so. Frankly hired employees would be just as subject to the conditions any slave would, and while true a non-slave would be able to quit, most wouldn't unless conditions were truely abhorrent.Slaves are more useful in remote places that are short on available hands and hard to escape from like distant colonies, plantations, mines, or galleys.
As opposed to a competent, reliable slave, one which both has the ability and willingness to kill on command AND not think about killing a single girl in the middle of nowhere, the act would not only grand them freedom but also everything in the house and said act would not be noticed for days?And I truely think you are underestimating how easy it is to find and hire competent and reliable employees...
I get you, but so many isekai and fantasy want to hook on the "they're yours forever and thus can't betray you because magic"Why are they always so tied to using slaves? Seriously!! Indentured servants are right there! So many fewer negative connotations. Unless they're extremely tied to the fact that you own them for life and they're property instead of just being "stronger than employment"
It's like they feel like these alternate worlds need slaves to prove they're more barbaric. The MCs always get slaves, but they're the good kind of slave owner which doesn't abuse their slaves unlike the evil slave owners.
It's one of my least favorite things about reading manga. Both the slave stuff, and the sexualization of child-like bodies is just so weird.