@me474 history shows though that the peasants may not necessarily be benefiting from that claim. Historically, according to the economic historian, Michael Hudson, most peasants did not consider themselves as members of a nation, but instead viewed matters locally/provincially. The people who benefitted from the arbitrary lines of nation states were those in power, the ruling class. In fact, this is why fascism and other forms of nationalism ultimately have been historically in the benefit of an oligarchy as opposed to the multitudes.
The current situation in the US is a prime example of this—who benefits from the imperialist wars? By and large, any benefits the multitudes received from these wars ultimately do not benefit them, & by and large can be viewed ultimately as further forms of exploitation by an oligarchy that further enriches themselves at the detriment to the multitudes.
As such, I've yet to see evidence that supports your claim/her claim that she cares at all for her country/people. If they mattered meaningfully, and love was a powerful force, would she be using these tactics in the first place? Would someone from her side volunteer? Would she even have the power to decide on her own?