Senpai, Jitaku Keibiin no Koyou wa Ikaga desu ka? - Ch. 1

[Xero210234]

Dawg..wtf

W PFP

 

[Xero210234]

USED TO BE A MAN?! YOUR SPEAR SHOULD MEET ANOTHER SPEAR IN ITS FIRST BATTLE TO PROVE ITS WORTH

also this manga had too much dick jokes for a first chapter

It would be interesting to see a manga like that but too complicated I'm guessing

 

[sotokouya]

Instantly turned me off with the purity bullshit and then turns out the story also has some sus as fuck power imbalance going on. At least MC didn't fuck her, yet.

page 8 made my skin crawl from secondhand embarrassment

 

[prototype2579]

So, if she's a high school girl now, and they started messaging 5 years ago, how old was she back then?

She'd be in junior high and he'd be last year of high school I guess.

 

[wallsg]

...

When someone in English says something is over 100% likely to happen, it’s usually an exaggeration meant to show that they are sure that it would happen. I don’t really see a problem with this. Also the 90% and 200% don’t need to add up to 100% not just because of the exaggeration, but also because they are separate scenarios where probability is independently calculated.

...

As a somewhat famous example of what you're saying:

 

[zco]

absolute degen shit subscribe

 

[HunterCO]

The FBI will be watching also why are some of yall mad about the potential trans fellow, not really a new a thing in anime or manga

 

[Imaturtlebruh]

Love that fuck you it's so perfect

 

[HighPriest]

Someone call Chris Hansen.

 

[GetRekdm8]

Ain't no way some of y'all getting mad at a female character being a virgin 💀 also these other complaints are wild and very telling

 

[AlexUSV]

Ain't no way some of y'all getting mad at a female character being a virgin 💀 also these other complaints are wild and very telling

wha , i didnt readed the comments but if its true then dang, like what is the problem.

 

[GetRekdm8]

wha , i didnt readed the comments but if its true then dang, like what is the problem.

Yes, it's pretty pathetic. The "problem" being that in the modern day sexual promiscuity is championed, so people that engage in it think that if you are not having tons of casual sex and ruining your pair bonding it is "weird" and "abnormal". Just more "what's natural and good is BAD, and what's bad is GOOD."
It reminds me of drug addicts who say dumb crap like "what do straight edge people even do all day/for fun lol". Fitting, actually, since they're just addicts for sex instead.
The concept of just not succumbing to every single impulse in one's brain and to every societal pressure is foreign to addicts.