@gaigous @alacaelum Yeah, I'm loving the choices for the setting in that regard. Of course, it's not just Japanese fiction; the tropes "creator provincialism" and "Eagleland" exist for a reason. It's also noticeable in other countries that are not "Japan". Check many anime and manga, and the "good" nation tends to be this country that is peaceful, isolationist and neutral. Meanwhile, the great foreign superpowers plot evil things for them because they covet their land, resources or are just dicks.
Interestingly, the Not!Japans rarely cross into Imperial Nostalgia territory. You know the drill: there will be a vaguely Germanic Empire/Kingdom/Authoritarian power with aristocratic paraphernalia. Sure, they may be power-hungry aggressors, but they are COOL. And their characters talk a lot about honor, duty, loyalty, etc. Well, they may commit crimes sometimes (or very often), but, hey, since they have some sympathetic characters, we shouldn't judge them too harshly. Wars are bad, right? And warring countries do bad things, including the "good guys" sometimes. Ergo, it means that as long as the war ends everything is fine and nobody should think of pesky questions such as "who started it", "why they started it", "who committed war crimes" and "who should pay war reparations".
Bonus points if the democratic powers in the setting are presented as equally evil or morally bankrupt, and if the moral is that the Empire would be the best and most efficient country in the universe if only the "right" person was in charge.
This setting seems a bit more self-conscious in its treatment of geopolitics, so I'm moderately optimistic. This very chapter points out that the "good guys" still remain agents of another foreign superpower who wants to increase its influence in the region. It's just that they are more benevolently pragmatic about it than the opposition.
And yes, I also miss Batoto comments