Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
- Messages
- 9,695
@wowfucktron
Doing so doesn't necessarily mean 'this smoothbrainite and all his takes are bad', but it does mean that people use their basic pattern recognition to realize "hey, this guy's on about some nonsensical shit, and he might be on about some nonsensical shit in the future" and then, subconsciously or otherwise, assign less credibility to smooth-kun's takes (and by extension, smooth-kun himself).
Yes, separating a person from his/her argument is ideal; but insight to that person's thoughts/experiences/worldview is never unhelpful when trying to understand where someone's coming from (outside of some devil's advocate-type debate).
Not at all. React content on YouTube is usually lazy as fuuuuuck. it's a joke guys I know what reactionaries areimplying I should become a reactionary
People post legitimately smoothbrain things that can be found every now and then (or pretty often depending on where you look), and you along with others have recognized takes as being 'wtf' material.My opinions of others aren’t lowered via comments on the web, I assume most use it to vent anonymously.
Doing so doesn't necessarily mean 'this smoothbrainite and all his takes are bad', but it does mean that people use their basic pattern recognition to realize "hey, this guy's on about some nonsensical shit, and he might be on about some nonsensical shit in the future" and then, subconsciously or otherwise, assign less credibility to smooth-kun's takes (and by extension, smooth-kun himself).
Yes, separating a person from his/her argument is ideal; but insight to that person's thoughts/experiences/worldview is never unhelpful when trying to understand where someone's coming from (outside of some devil's advocate-type debate).
Using your 'tolerant' neighbor as an example, would you not even subconsciously lower your opinion (and/or assign less credibility to the words) of someone even if he/she were to say the exact same things your neighbor does, but online?IRL my opinions are only really lowered via actions.
I guess "most" technically could make mentioning this irrelevant, but the same things said below this quote could potentially go for a lot of people, since there's no way to know what someone else is thinking. A spectrum also exists concerning the intensity of emotions, where there's a substantial distance between 'monk status' and 'perpetual state of resentment/blame/etc.' (there's probably a better way to phrase it but yeah).sometimes I honestly believe I am compared to most people.