@MaliciousBurial in the case that you provide---if someone puts someone else in charge of their responsibilities, then, unless the person was incapacitated in such a way that they could not perform those duties (you can't have
responsibilities if you can't
respond), then the person at the top, as you've said, would ultimately face penalty. As for the CEO holding final culpability, that depends upon the circumstances. If we look at how this plays out in the real world, as the saying goes, "shit rolls down-hill", and by that it means that people in higher positions of power will seek to offload culpability by trying to pin the blame on a lower figure. Jun is dong her part
now to clean up her mess---she's taking responsibility (by responding) to the situation. However, it's questionable to what degree the goddess responds. There hasn't been an implicit rationale as for why she can't directly act, and thus she's depending upon others. If those other people fail, unfortunately, she's somehow dodging responsibility and culpability for any wrongdoing or negligence.
If you hire a firm to vet another firm, you're responsible for not vetting the vetting firm. They're then responsible for their failure to vet the next one, and the next one for not doing the job correctly. Hence, why lawsuits end up with a TON of people getting sued for each individual's failure to play their part correctly.