Vinland Saga - Ch. 215 - Thousand Year Voyage Part 24

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
168
Only question in my mind is whether the colony is exterminated or simply retreats.
I mean the women and children have already been evacuated, and I doubt the Lnu warriors would have that much interest in continuing to pursue them. So I think total extermination is already off the table.

Anyways, we already have real life history to tell us the overall fate, which is that the colony failed and they returned to Iceland and Greenland (though apparently a number of people also ended up dying from disease on the journey back).
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
129
I mean the women and children have already been evacuated, and I doubt the Lnu warriors would have that much interest in continuing to pursue them. So I think total extermination is already off the table.

Anyways, we already have real life history to tell us the overall fate, which is that the colony failed and they returned to Iceland and Greenland (though apparently a number of people also ended up dying from disease on the journey back).
Yeah I mean the question has always been how close are we going to hew to history though, lol, Yukimura has been perfectly happy to diverge from the records where it suits him.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jul 19, 2024
Messages
34
Iceland isn't so low on food productivity that it wouldn't be able to handle the return of less total people than who originally left Iceland only a year or two ago. While returning and readjustment certainly wouldn't be a comfortable or easy process, none of the Norse settlers' very survival depends on being able to still live in the Vinland village specifically. Like there is a reason we are calling the Norse settlers and not refugees, their choice to come and try to settle Vinland was ultimately a voluntary endeavor and not a case of being forced out of their original homes.

And yeah, at the moment Einar is in a situation where he effectively has no choice but to fight for his survival, but the point of the narrative is that Einar's prior choices are partially responsible for leading to be in a situation where he "has no choice".
I was thinking more of being freeholders; of living outside the feudal systems that dominate most of Europe (and much of Iceland) and which really means having relationships with an underlying basis of violence. That was the major motivation to go after all. They didn't come to Vinland to avoid death, but they did come because most of them were not able to achieve genuine freedom in other social milieus of the era. Though, given how things have gone, obviously it would probably be more peaceful than this.

I agree its not life or death, yeah.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
531
Everything has its own nuances, yes, but “I was forced” in such things is always very manipulative and reeks of shifting the blame to others. In the style of “I didn’t want to kill you during the theft, but you forced me by trying to resist me.” Einar's logic can be understood, but the fact that he is the protagonist does not make his ambitions more valuable and important than the interests of other people.
Uh, you're talking as if everything was planned. Einar did not decide to kill someone and then went all "My hand was forced" like some super villain.
His "I had no other choice, I was forced, I had to kill him" is a traumatic response, that's his brain negating responsability trying to not break under the stress.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
129
Uh, you're talking as if everything was planned. Einar did not decide to kill someone and then went all "My hand was forced" like some super villain.
His "I had no other choice, I was forced, I had to kill him" is a traumatic response, that's his brain negating responsability trying to not break under the stress.
Sure, it's an understandable trauma response. But it would be healthier in the long-term for him as the person experiencing it and especially for us as readers to understand that at the end of the day, it's just not true - not in the way that he wants it to be, anyway.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
4,747
Uh, you're talking as if everything was planned. Einar did not decide to kill someone and then went all "My hand was forced" like some super villain.
His "I had no other choice, I was forced, I had to kill him" is a traumatic response, that's his brain negating responsability trying to not break under the stress.
I spoke a little about Einar, and a lot about the “he was forced” defense and its problems as such. As you can see from your quotation of my words, I myself said that his motivation can be understood, even if you generally consider his actions to be wrong. It just seemed to me that some people tried to justify this, although the author himself implied that Einar was traumatized by this and was looking for an excuse.
Sure, it's an understandable trauma response. But it would be healthier in the long-term for him as the person experiencing it and especially for us as readers to understand that at the end of the day, it's just not true - not in the way that he wants it to be, anyway.
Yes, you said it better than me. I like the theory that psychologically, everyone needs to believe that they are right, so when we do objectively or even subjectively bad things, our brain tries to find a convenient explanation for this in order to resolve the moral dissonance and potential conflict because of the realization of the bad deeds we have committed. This is probably one of the explanations for the work of conscience.
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
129
Yes, you said it better than me. I like the theory that psychologically, everyone needs to believe that they are right, so when we do objectively or even subjectively bad things, our brain tries to find a convenient explanation for this in order to resolve the moral dissonance and potential conflict because of the realization of the bad deeds we have committed. This is probably one of the explanations for the work of conscience.
And like I said earlier, I think it's important for us to remember that Einar himself knows (or at least knew) better when not under the immediate stress of battle. He knows that he "has a choice" when it comes to fighting for the colony. He thinks(thought) fighting is the right choice, but he knows full well thanks to Thorfinn that there are other choices. They're bitter, and hard, and may well fail to achieve his desired outcome - but they're there if he has the will to pursue them. He just doesn't want to. It's only when he's confronted with the full horror of what his choice truly means that he starts wanting to believe that he was just locked into this path outside of his control. A very understandable response in the moment, but a dangerous one.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
4,747
And like I said earlier, I think it's important for us to remember that Einar himself knows (or at least knew) better when not under the immediate stress of battle. He knows that he "has a choice" when it comes to fighting for the colony. He thinks(thought) fighting is the right choice, but he knows full well thanks to Thorfinn that there are other choices. They're bitter, and hard, and may well fail to achieve his desired outcome - but they're there if he has the will to pursue them. He just doesn't want to. It's only when he's confronted with the full horror of what his choice truly means that he starts wanting to believe that he was just locked into this path outside of his control. A very understandable response in the moment, but a dangerous one.
If I remember correctly, from the very beginning we were shown Einar as a good but conflicted person who sincerely believes in Thorfin's philosophy, but cannot fully free himself from the traumatic experience he has endured. Perhaps this is justified by the plot in that since Thorfin plays the role of a strong-willed moral leader and messiah, we also need a more realistic character who experiences moral conflicts due to trying to be true to his rules of life in difficult conditions.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 3, 2018
Messages
243
Perhaps the author wants to show that violence cannot be eliminated from a person forever, since even with reason, we are still living beings with emotions, attachments, etc.


I'm done. If you are unironically going to endlessly argue for the sake of arguing just to keep a good face on a bad game and convince yourself that morality and the worldview are universal, and any differences in views and conflicts are exceptions and violations of the “general truth,” then so be it. It seems that I have once again forgotten the words of Rousseau that trying to enlighten some people is like trying to illuminate the hollow of an Owl.
You trying to sound philosophical and thinking you're ending it on some moral victory is hilarious despite typing like a complete fucking buffoon for several pages.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
4,747
You trying to sound philosophical and thinking you're ending it on some moral victory is hilarious despite typing like a complete fucking buffoon for several pages.
It’s not that we’ve made peace a long time ago and admitted mutual misunderstanding, but why pay attention to such little things if you can just quote a random comment and offend someone! I like it, keep going.
 
Last edited:
Power Uploader
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
302
Ignorance does not save you from responsibility. Just imagine that someone beats you without knowing that beating people is bad and illegal, would you consider this an excuse? Illness is not the best example here, since violation of established rules and ignorance of things that are not known to many, are two different things.

Violence between communities is always a double tragedy for one reason or another. But in this case, Thorfin's pacifism did not work, because the Vikings did not take into account that differences in culture could go that far. It would be easier for them to reach an agreement if it were another European or at least Asian people, but America for Europeans at that time was almost like another planet. Even after many centuries, Indians and conquistadors will perceive each other as different creatures due to the enormous difference in culture and history.
Sorry but this part is insane to me. Like the whole arc is about how the Europeans don't understand. That is the whole reason we are here. You are acting like Europe was one of the people who had the same mindset. Man Vikings were not seen as great by 90% of Europe. Ask the English kingdoms how they felt.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
4,747
Sorry but this part is insane to me. Like the whole arc is about how the Europeans don't understand. That is the whole reason we are here. You are acting like Europe was one of the people who had the same mindset. Man Vikings were not seen as great by 90% of Europe. Ask the English kingdoms how they felt.
Let me guess, you completely ignored my comment, where I clarify that the point was that if even our own people don’t understand them, then what’s the point about the Indians? It’s normal not to understand someone else’s words and ask for clarification. But I have a feeling that some people find it much easier to criticize you than to make sure that they understood your words correctly. And yeah, dude, don't tell me about the Vikings. I live in a country where the first statehood appeared thanks to the Swedish Vikings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rurik
 
Last edited:
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
548
...
:meguuusad:
Everything is fucked up and I am 99.9% sure it will get worse.
Damn it all.:angery:
:aquadrink:

apuveryangry.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top