Watashi no koto, Netotte Misete

Joined
Mar 20, 2025
Messages
1
I bet this is what most girls dream for...

Getting banged by a strong, tall, dark and handsome chad everytime he wants to "tame" her female desires.

And having some cuck-beta-orbiter waiting to marry her after she's had her "fun" expelled from her system.

Or after chad gifts her some "strong seeds", to activate her motherly wants.

And the shota-beta-cuck-orbiter will be glad to take care of said child, and foot the bill, and marry her by the State, so she can get 50% custody on everything he earns.

I tell you, this was made most likely by a female author with some insane levels of hypergamy overflowing her hormones.
Or some cuck enthusiast seeking to share his kink of providing to a 304 who is most likely only 15 years old.
when your only knowledge of women is through anime and manga lol. If a NTR manga got this mad then you should go outside and touch some grass dude
 
Joined
Apr 27, 2025
Messages
1
Isn't this a NTR?
I mean the MC goals are to steal his crush from her boyfriend after all, so it's on the NTR category.
Well, the MC is understandable for me. cause i am loner lol. But the fact that he is willing to sacrifice everything just to get his crush is probably insanity. Well, his crush shouldn't fire it up in the first place.

Also, his crush is probably a bitch.
Why would a girl like her cheat on her boyfriend with a loner guy like the MC anyway?
"""Realisticly""", a girl would cheat on their partner if she got manipulated by another entity or that she has interests with another person (for whatever category).
She probably knew that the MC has an advantage over his current boyfriend for the long term...
or she is just a bitch who wants to play with MC feelings (who knows) 🤷‍♂️.


Anyway, at the time I am writing this, only the first chapter is out, and even if I am (kind of) sending bad opinions on this, this title is hella interesting.
So I'll tag along with you on this for next chapters.
Technically it's along the lines of reverse NTR. You're meant to identify with the one doing the stealing rather than the one being stolen from.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top